Politics
Politics
Out of context: Reply #30644
- Started
- Last post
- 33,769 Responses
- whatthefunk0
- the American left is just as retarded. weren't the democrats responsible for Jim Crow laws?_niko
- @_niko, this is about the "right," regardless of party or centurymonospaced
- aka, the democrats back then were the conservative right, so absolutely no relation to today, and shouldn't be used as onemonospaced
- ah gotcha._niko
- Totally forgot Muslims.ArmandoEstrada
- didn't the right care about 9/11?Gnash
- ha ha well anyone with any history knowledge can see this for hyperbole. Going back to indians it wasn't even right vs left debate considering neither existed********
- perhaps images like this do more harm for the "left" they represent. Or perhaps that is the plan of the russian trolls! Over the top nonsense to try and get********
- emo reaction and strengthen divides based on nonsense... or just random ignorance and flag flying to attract like minds.********
- Both left and right existed before this country was founded.monospaced
- ironically, the left were the christiansGnash
- Protestants maybe? Were Catholics the right? I know it's not as simple as that, but sure :)monospaced
- those are all christiansGnash
- well, yeah, but at the time of the country's founding, the was a massive divide between catholics and protestants ... enouhg to form a new country :)monospaced
- If, for you, the "left" was all christians, who do you place as the "right" back then?monospaced
- the fucking frenchGnash
- Hahaha. Cmon. I figured left and right were always parts of the same nation or group by definition.monospaced
- hell liberalism doesn't mean what it meant in the 30s and definition has been quite twisted. as far as church goes they have more in sync********
- with todays democratic party. They were all about the collectivism and pushing same issues, they only disagree on who is leading. if democrats embraced the********
- church for power we'd be fucked. thank god idiots on both sides of the fence********
- but its funny to trace definitions of parties and look at policy over time. you tend to see this pole reversal effect********
- "if democrats embraced the church for power we'd be fucked." Please elaborate.monospaced
- the far left already behaves like a religionGnash
- you could say that about any extreme group, easilymonospaced
- the left are particularly adept at using the mechanisms of denunciation and punishment used by religious inquisitors for heresies against The doctrineGnash
- I feel like you've gone completely off topic with this :)monospaced
- I can barely remember my what I had for breakfast, maintaining a focused train of thought is near impossibleGnash
- democratic policy tries to promise everything a religion does as far as security as long as you follow along. the only difference is you follow actual people********
- vs the priests and prophets devining knowledge. And instead of after life, more directed to this life. Same obvious tactics********
- Ever look at a faithful church goer and wonder how they got fooled they seem like a normal person. Than go home and cheer on something like GND********
- those people are actually quite similar. they're just culturally triggered to respond different to sets of stimuli. if you could combine them it would be strong********
- but for topic. image that means nothing. your russian meme shit. an idea of american right only exists right now, not the past because no such party********
- existed under the name. And just terrible commentary since it has OMG russians... jsut a trademark example of social sharing********
- that people say had a russian influence.********
- maybe you will notice the trends and see what info is fodder, entertainment, or substance better.********
- "if democrats embraced the church for power we'd be fucked." Please elaborate.monospaced
- I just did. Could you elaborate on what you couldn't follow? Any clue on what confuses you?********
- Hopefully that ? doesn't stump you... if it does save time and don't go forward.********
- you're comparing the democratic party with religion (terribly), but you did not even start to touch on the idea of democrats embracing the church.monospaced
- Only one party "embraces the church" and that's the republican party. And yes, it's certainly "fucked" a lot of Americans in doing so. Dems are fighting that.monospaced
- Church has no place in government. One party seems to be confused about this and continues to push for its inclusion. Democrats aren't doing that.monospaced
- So once again, what do you mean by "if democrats embraced the church for power" ? The church has no power.monospaced
- If you intend to just repeat your schtick about politics resembling the moronic belief structure of religion, then save time and don't go forward. Derp.monospaced
- i said "if" they did. the only difference between christian/catholiscm and democrats p;atform is who they beleive to be the omnipotent ruler********
- a public servant or all powerful being. im just repeating myself now.********
- maybe you are unfamilair with collectivism morality? i dont understand what you are missing...********
- reps embrace church even though its more in line with democratic principles. Its always funny the hypocrisy in the parties embrace of things being really so********
- similar. dogmatic rule through faith or gov, is no different. principles rules on reason and logic are the difference********
- leftist claims of GND or FDR second bill of rights idea is dogmatic. its not based on reason. you can breakdown any and see it makes no sense********
- you see many dogmatic principles in church regarding social liberties. gays, birth control etc. its irrational to follow those as much as every one has a right********
- to say healthcare. jsut making shit up and declaring shit as rights or wrongs without any reasoning beside declaration. if the left could create an idea of a********
- false god or second coming, they could pull all the people from the right that are all about being ruled in a collective********
- theyre already their subjugated by faith the same as the faith left believers have in omnipotent democratically appointed rulers. just be the people like me********
- left. that just want to be free and live truthfully and honestly by principled reasoning********
- NONE of what you're rambling about even touches on a party embracing any religion. FFS, do you even read what you write?monospaced
- haha it all does. wether you see it or not is dependent upon your cognition and understanding. do you notice that you dont cite anything i said?********
- and depict why or how it doesn't seem involved. in educated circles that would be protocol at least. in walmart declarations of yours more fitting********
- based on my cognition and understanding!? dude, I run circles around you there. You didn't even TOUCH on "embracing religion"monospaced
- if you HAD, you would have specified a religion, and then talked about how they would embrace it for power. You didn't.monospaced
- you dont need to specify a religion when you see its base formula. which is collectivism and i explained plenty about power of such.********
- if you run circles around me perhaps you really understand the differences between ideal socialism and christianity? and can explain them********
- because im pretty sure thats where u stumble on what im talking about.i talk an explain connection and u fingers in ear and say no********
- or just try to suggest i haven't said anything. so its up to you now. fundamental differences of christianity vs socialism********
- id say let it be homework, but you dont have a textbook. gonna have to dig deep into yourself********