Politics
Politics
Out of context: Reply #30267
- Started
- Last post
- 33,769 Responses
- ********-5
https://www.youtube.com/watch?ti…
A few things I like is the vid is done by a foreign chic easy on the eyes. Always great they use examples of people who have experienced what is being preached vs those who have never experienced anything they are selling. Hard to buy a vacuum cleaner from someone who has never used one while trying to read the manufacture notes.
Dont like the soundbyte style. but this is the game for todays audiences.
- i still question whom benefits voting up or down. well not really. its AB testing to push the best drivel to the top. i just don't see qbn's gain in the system********
- they don't capitalize on users. There's no need to control for majority. still very curious of the their end goals on such a thing********
- your links starts 41s. 1st thing she said is socialism "always leads to violence". Given the deeply violent culture of USA i would say her claim needs reviewinglowimpakt
- I stopped watching after that because if that is the level of analysis it's not worth watchinglowimpakt
- im sorry low i didn't know copy paste post start at a set time. just go to the beginning. as far as socialism violence vs usa violence... well you need more********
- than the generalizations which she details. Were not talking us civil war violence, more just functioning systems of gov in western world vs others********
- nicuarage(sp dk), venezuela, eastern blocks. Violence has historically been more prevalent in such systems********
- If you tune it out without watching it through I wonder if you are just confirming your own bias?********
- I also ask you Low to describe your view of the deeply violent culture of the US. Only in understanding your view of what that means can we begin to make compar********
- isons********
- The US has been at war in some form for almost the entirety of its existence https://en.wikipedia…lowimpakt
- but what ideals created the war low? was it not collective interest?********
- Im sure the my sentiments don't change based on the politics or war.this isnt about look theres war. its what causes it********
- and your wiki link was broken. but i get the jist of your approach. if you want to explain wars happens less with mob rule********
- i think you will be challenged. I dont know where war hasn't evolved from some strong collectivist view********
- you could argue the north in the civil war had a strong collective view point in they worked together********
- however there view was founded in individual rights. the south was collective********
- and yes sometimes collectives can and do help the individual cause. many exist with claims they do such things. but few do.********
- i still question whom benefits voting up or down. well not really. its AB testing to push the best drivel to the top. i just don't see qbn's gain in the system