The Great Flood scientific evidence thread
The Great Flood scientific evidence thread
Out of context: Reply #19
- Started
- Last post
- 30 Responses
- set-15
- Part of Anger and Bargaining i think.ApeRobot
- Mass consensus and a multitude of measurable datapoints that form a bank of evidence (subject to re-interpretation if required) don't make any difference?detritus
- Of course they make a difference but this is a still a vastly hypocritical and shallow way of trying to rubbish this offset
- Not to mention pure denial of the evidenceset
- It does require explanation as to why, when faced with conclusions reached through use of the scientific method, some folk round here reject them without...Morning_star
- ...consideration. Instead, choosing their own dogma as 'gospel'.Morning_star
- ^ Well said. It's insanity.set
- You even copied my wink. How did you not see I was just playing with you man? I AM POINTING OUT exactly this. Haha.monospaced
- You called me out on trusting science. I was just doing the same. Difference is I’m not calling you a hypocrite for it. ;)monospaced
- I mean, did you get so stoned you don’t recognize I’m using your exact question and words back to you? lol, love you man. Please chill.monospaced
- I called you out on talking as if it was absolute fact when all you've done is read other people's research, right?set
- I've only ever said here that it's what I think is the most likely conclusion based on reading other people's research. Monumental difference, dude...set
- It was a joke!monospaced
- It's always a joke rightset