Politics

Out of context: Reply #27785

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 33,773 Responses
  • ********
    -5
    • Google Fires Diversity Manifesto Author James Damore For WrongThink
      ********
    • Whoopty-fucking-do.Continuity
    • He has every right to say what he wants. But that doesn't mean everyone has to agree with his dumb ass views.err
    • Meanwhile Google pretends to be a free think work environment.
      ********
    • If you can't agree with a standing company policy, feel free to quite and go work somewhere that's more suited to your stupidity.Continuity
    • Where do you work omg?err
    • He doesn't. No self-respecting company would want to hire him.Continuity
    • “The company was founded under the principles of freedom of expression, diversity, inclusiveness and science-based thinking,” - Eric Schmidt
      ********
    • So much for Google's diversity.
      ********
    • Boo-hoo. You're breaking our hearts.Continuity
    • lol, Continuity. Did they beat you up in school alot?
      ********
    • Google, the company that wants to be fun and politically correct at the same time.Maaku
    • You were the kid they taunted, stuffed in lockers in high school?
      ********
    • ^ Continutity
      ********
    • I'm afraid not. That would be you.Continuity
    • What exactly are you afraid of Continuity? They teased you mostly in college?
      ********
    • Truth exposed.
      ********
    • I'm certainly not afraid of genetic deficients like you, that's for sure.Continuity
    • Google didn't lose any diversity, they just lost one asshole.monospaced
    • Google lost the image of diversity. The others in Google have to keep their mouths shut.
      ********
    • LOL
      Clearly your sister-mother dropped you on your head one too many times.
      Continuity
    • that link is pure fucking shit. completely fails to mention that Damore's argument is based on 'men and women are simply biologically different' #fakeviewsBluejam
    • Which is why inbred trailer trash, like our very own omg, here, gravitates towards these sort of 'views'.Continuity
    • private company. they can fire people they think are assholes all they want.lowimpakt
    • they didn't lose the image of diversity, they just lost one assholemonospaced
    • the author is free to have his opinions outside of google. however, he posted them inside google which is a private org that has a code of conduct.dorf
    • google had no choice but to fire him since he created a hostile work environment for everybody else. this is not a free speech issue either as it's not gov't.dorf
    • also, using words like wrongthink or referring to 1984, Orwell - totally misses the point of the book.dorf
    • Its then a false flag that anyone has to respect the opinions of the few and instead call them assholes. so much for think different.
      ********
    • respecting opinions and being an asshole are not mutually exclusive.dorf
    • lol, omg still completely misunderstanding what free speech entails, and what infringement of it actually covers? holy shit, he still doesn't get it.monospaced
    • mono, what you don't understand may be Google's ethos in what they project as diverse and free thinking.
      ********
    • Yes I understand the corporate wall has the power to eliminate constitutional rights within their ranks.
      ********
    • Not only does it go against their own philosophies, it should also be worrisome as they head to control all your information in the future.
      ********
    • dont accuse me of not understanding what you are twisting, because I'm not that stupid, dense or misinformedmonospaced
    • dorf already spelled it out, and you've chosen to continue misunderstanding what diversity actually means, and where being a straight up asshole isn't toleratedmonospaced
    • He didn't misunderstand, mono, he's being a very deliberate troll.Continuity
    • Google had many choices actually. Damore didn't create a hostile work, as much as those who responded.
      ********
    • Google simply took the ethos of the lynch mob because they were holding all the pitchforks and fire.
      ********
    • No Continuity, you just interject with no contribution or position to only pussy foot with name calling.
      ********
    • That's a heart-breaking take you're telling, omg. We're really fucking touched.Continuity
    • you're not touched, just ignorant.
      ********
    • Mm-hm. Tell me more about my ignorance, you inbred redneck.Continuity
    • Your response is more than enough to prove my point of ignorance
      ********
    • LOL. That's right. You got me. Oh, you got me.

      Cretin.
      Continuity
    • jeez omg is simply pointing out the hypocrisy. this he is correct. and i fully support googles right to fire the guy or any minority, woman, or trans
      ********
    • but i wonder OMG if its the hypocrisy thats bugs you or that they can fire anyone? u are all socialist in your political picks
      ********
    • but thanks for the great example of ppl missing a OBVIOUS point because they dont like the idea of you they associate with your handle
      ********
    • 'bugs' doesn't justify the outrage of concern i think folks should give Google's hypocritical response.
      ********
    • incase i dont make it back to this post...hypocrisy is you cant support diversity while firing based on diversity. capt wow state they preach an ideal for marke
      ********
    • ting and shareholder value which is not valued in practice. cant have your cake and eat it too. OBVIOUS. correct response is nothing to capt wow
      ********
    • or yea sure but what would u have liked them to do facing the insecurity of shareholders and media play on shareholder value? did u really believe an "company"
      ********
    • can have a philosophy in the first place? a couple better responses if u want real engagement
      ********
    • omg do u respect their right to fire a worker no matter race, opinion, or anything? Like would u car e if they fired someone for being gay
      ********
    • if they ignored the diversity internal branding and goodwill marketing BS?
      ********

View thread