blog

Out of context: Reply #66077

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 76,744 Responses
  • ********
    0

    Do you think the courts would look at 8 year old cctv footage over a minor £250 fine?

    ********
    0Permalink
    UpvoteDownvote
    Flag
    • A friend has asked ;)
      ********
    • youre Fd
      ********
    • Does CCTV footage last that long? I thought there was a restricted time limit on how long it could be kept after-the-fact.face_melter
    • i guess it's attached to a 8 year old case, and your friend just got identified recently
      ********
    • It wouldn't be attached to the case as the case has only just opened
      ********
    • I too remember reading that cctv footage only lasts so long
      ********
    • if it's a minor offence then of course they aren't gonna waste more £££ looking for CCTV than the fine. Tell your mate to pay up for his silly behaviour and letfadein11
    • them get on with more important stuff.fadein11
    • Don't jump to your moral high ground conclusions shit for brains. Someone used his name and address. He didn't commit the offence.
      ********
    • the cctv would prove his innocence, but unlikely it'll be available.
      ********
    • https://upload.wikim…detritus
    • Is the only evidence they've got the provided name and address? Not exactly proof, is it?detritus
    • Indeed
      ********
    • why ask the question then lol - this will be thrown out of court numbnuts.fadein11
    • and what a fucking bizarre place to ask the question Columbo ;)fadein11
    • Oh fadein, fadein, fadein you sore little twit. Chin up
      ********
    • lol you sensitive old sod :)fadein11
    • *watches 3 hours of CSI Miami*
      It looks like your friends minor fine (puts on glasses) just took a major turn.
      YEEEEAAAAAAHHHHH      kona
    • Kisses
      ********
    • lol konascarabin
    Show [[ numHiddenNotes ]] more notesAdd Note
    SaveCancel

View thread