Politics
Politics
Out of context: Reply #24402
- Started
- Last post
- 33,773 Responses
- ********-9
If you are interested in the travel ban on terror. This video is from someone on the inside. It is something to think about.
- It's a travel ban on muslims...see_thru
- But they already admitted they were lying fucks and said it wasn't a ban at all. Derp.monospaced
- the Executive Order does not mention Islam, or any other religions. CNN used the word “Muslim,” not Trump.********
- Would that scenario he spoke of had happened before the ban?********
- The Department of State warns U.S. citizens against all travel to Iraq. Superseding a Travel Warning dated July 6, 2016********
- The order states 'predominantly muslim'...and Trump, Spicer and Conway are all on record using 'muslim' and 'ban' in the same sentence.see_thru
- My bad...it doesn't state that, it prioritizes Christians, and being applied to majority muslim countries it's easily interpreted as a muslim ban.see_thru
- My comments on T, S & C still stand...this issue and omg's trolling is making me so goddam angry.see_thru
- @see_thru, I agree a ban doesn't make me happy either. Mentions of 'muslim' or 'ban' are not in the EO, and will affect both Syrian Christians and Muslims.********
- it doesn't have to be, omg ... it's simple deduction and honestly, everyone alive who has even the smallest bit of sense understands that it's about muslimsmonospaced
- if it's not about addressing "radical islamic terrorism" then what the fuck is it about? yeah, that's what I thought, you moronmonospaced
- You would think saving 1/2 the refugees would be ideal since 44% of the refugees are Christians who are getting they're heads chopped off.********
- http://www.pewresear…********
- My first concern would be the safety of Americans before unnecessarily putting them in danger of any terrorist threat.********