Politics
Out of context: Reply #23415
- Started
- Last post
- 33,773 Responses
- BuddhaHat2
I couldn't find it using the search, but many many pages back I said that whether or not it was proven that Russian officials were involved in influencing the US election that Putin and his high-ranking KGB friends would be toasting to Trump's victory, and now today WaPo releases this:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/w…
"Senior officials in the Russian government celebrated Donald Trump’s victory over Hillary Clinton as a geopolitical win for Moscow, according to U.S. officials who said that American intelligence agencies intercepted communications in the aftermath of the election in which Russian officials congratulated themselves on the outcome."Upon the release of this information, which was further shared by NBC news, Trump has announced an investigation into NBC for receiving the information before he did.
So, this gigantically insecure and stupid man-baby has announced an investigation into NBC, an outlet that didn't even make the initial release (WaPo did):
"Trump appears to have gotten a number of important details wrong about the NBC story. No one “gave” NBC the top-secret report, as Trump claimed. As the NBC story notes, the official quoted by the network never even saw a copy of the intelligence report; he or she just repeated to NBC what someone had said about its findings."
So, Trump's priority is to investigate the outlet that hurt his feelings/ego, not to investigate the evidence that a totalitarian dictator and established opponent of the US directly interfered in US political activities.
The world is soon going to run out of similes and historical comparisons to illustrate how fucking stupid and narcissistic Trump really is; he's truly lowering the bar, way way down into the swamp.
- Amazing no one complained when foreign governments interfered in US political activities on Hillary Clinton's side during her tenure and the elections. pfft********
- jesus, shut the fuck up already omg. yet again, you can't respond without saying 'CLINTON' or 'DEMOCRATS'BuddhaHat
- and which govts are you talking about? and what interference? and what measurable gain did she experience from this...BuddhaHat
- alleged interference?BuddhaHat
- NB: politicians saying 'we support Clinton because she's a better candidate than Trump for a laundry list of reasons'BuddhaHat
- lol, are those the new rules so you can win a debate or discussion? Then you cannot use the word "TRUMP" or 'REPUBLICANS" so that it's fair.********
- is not 'interference' in political activitiesBuddhaHat
- Trump is the subject of this post, Clinton or the democrats are not the subject of the article.BuddhaHat
- and they're not 'rules', you just drag the conversation into the stupidest of places with these false flags you keep flyingBuddhaHat
- that's all you can do, you can't read the article and respond to it, all you can come up with is 'but Clinton did the same', and it's not even true.BuddhaHat
- and because it's not true, you're either stupid or deliberately trying to mislead the conversation.BuddhaHat
- please, try and actually say something about Trump and his actions in response to the hacks, and the NBC 'non-report'BuddhaHat
- it's a legitimate assessment of foreign influence on US politics. I'm not going to tiptoe around her name usage, just so you can make a comparative thought. ffs********
- defend his actions, tell us why this information is wrong, or why it shouldn't concern everyone.BuddhaHat
- you're the one making it comparative you moron. you know, in that part where you compared it to Clinton?BuddhaHat
- but please, don't let me stop you trying to defend Trump on this one... do go on...BuddhaHat
- just try, as I have previously requested, to not mention his opponents, when they have absolutely nothing to do with itBuddhaHat
- show me the money and I'll take your side on this one. but right now, no one has direct proof of Russian gov't involvement.********
- and before you go on about defending "TRUMP" which you weren't supposed to use his name. We're defending America.********
- here's the 'money' https://www.scribd.c…BuddhaHat
- as I have stated, Trump is the subject of this post. Clinton, who you mentioned, is not. at all. in any way, shape or form.BuddhaHat
- yet it's your utterly predictable, nonsensical, idiotic go-to in every one of these situations.BuddhaHat
- and how is investigating NBC and not investigating foreign interference in the election process 'defending America?'BuddhaHat
- It's sad that millions of Americans buy that kind of meaningless drivel.BuddhaHat
- Khizr Khan would wave his little constitutional pocket book at you right now, if he heard what you said about America right now.********
- I was trying to establish the level of acceptance of foreign meddling in US politics.********
- There was plenty of foreign meddling during the election which can be measured financially.********
- omfg ... this is about an insecure jerk going after a tv network because he is butthurt and misunderstands how Russia helped him become PRESIDENT OF THE US.monospaced
- Pictures of Putin smiling with his pals is not proof of their involvement with US elections. At most they are fans watching the Super Bowl.********
- Clinton isn't really comparable when you take it for what it is.monospaced
- At the same time, the CIA is skipping around with allegations with no proof. You'd think after this long, they would have some by now.********
- omg, I already showed you the 'money'. your claim of no proof is again, either evidence of your stupidity or you being misleadingBuddhaHat
- #MRGAutopian
- The Khizr Khan comment is so off the mark as to make it the diarrhoea icing on your piece of shit argument.BuddhaHat
- Not one mention of WikiLeaks in the entire document. why is this?********
- Because it's a document prepared by US intelligence services. just like Clinton, Wikileaks has nothing to do with it.BuddhaHat
- ps. that last post read like an illogical Trump tweet. 'Ben & Jerry's release new ice cream flavour. Foot Locker has no comment. Why is this?'BuddhaHat
- The US citizens made their votes. Your claim is they were influenced then by what means if not by WikiLeaks or rigging the voting machines?********
- how can you be asking that if you read enough to not see reference to Wikileaks in there? it explains exactly how.BuddhaHat
- NBC and WikiLeaks are both publishing platforms. NBC and the document you sent me has "many" undisclosed sources.********
- However you'll trust NBC. The information you get from WikiLeaks comes from the same sources, you also trust.********
- So who exactly influence the US elections again?********
- Russian HTML coders?********
- omg, the intelligence services use undisclosed sources, or they wouldn't be useful sources for much longer, would they?BuddhaHat
- and again, it's funny that you claim to be 'defending america' and citing Khizr Khan waving a finger at me, when you're challenging...BuddhaHat
- the veracity of US intelligence servicesBuddhaHat
- your wikileaks/nbc sources comment is utter garbageBuddhaHat
- Wonder who these undisclosed sources could be. Maybe her friends in ISIS? Some more foreigner support? It's hard to tell where the hypocrisy begins and ends.********
- Actually with you, it never ends.********
- At least if you said Russian magic influenced the elections. Mono would have believed you.********
- God you're a fucking idiot, omg.BuddhaHat
- He's a big fan of the flying fingers.********
- Those things grab anything.********
- lol omg must be implying that both the CIA and FBI along with other top intelligence agencies made it all up and in fact had no proof at those hearings.monospaced
- Just monumentally, stupendously, amazingly, incredibly, jaw-droppingly, embarrassingly stupid.BuddhaHat
- i dismantled or discredited basically every statement you made in response to this post, so you finish with Clinton + ISIS. Idiocy.BuddhaHat
- It's just funny that my Khizr Khan had the constitution in his hand vs. your Khizr Khan did not.********
- ok now I'm leaning towards you being incredibly stupid, and becoming progressively more inebriated at the same time.BuddhaHat
- How much do you hate America again?********
- your comments are becoming increasingly unhinged.BuddhaHat
- LOLBuddhaHat
- Your Khizr Khan minus my Khizr Khan = how much I hate America. Which is to say.... you're an idiot.BuddhaHat
- You'd have them rolling in the aisles at the insane asylum, omg...BuddhaHat
- omg sometimes i can't decide that you're a blind patriot or just stupid:)********
- Amazing no one complained when foreign governments interfered in US political activities on Hillary Clinton's side during her tenure and the elections. pfft