Politics
Politics
Out of context: Reply #23348
- Started
- Last post
- 33,773 Responses
- whatthefunk5
- #WHORE FIRST LADY
#MAGA
#MADE IN CHINAutopian - lolmonospaced
- Security for the job creators are tax deductible.********
- ^ didn't you drop the "job creator bs" with the rest of the GOP? It's right up there with "trickle down" and "don't punish success" crap.formed
- Good marketing for a while, though. Suckers certainly ate it up (and some apparently still do).formed
- So you're saying security for job creators are NOT tax deductible? I think the IRS would tell you otherwise.********
- Would job recruiter be more appropriate? Or are we just not interested in paying finders fees?********
- interesting way to spin $909 million in losses that probably aren't even cash losses or financial losses, just real estate depreciation on leveraged assetswhatthefunk
- not illegal at all btw, I agree, it's just he's so good at net operating losses that he manages to fail in order to succeed financially - so smart...whatthefunk
- and with no skin in the game, b/c he's leveraged his other failures, he can afford to shut down an airline, football team, steak business, etc. and lose no $whatthefunk
- He'll cheat everyone or as Bloomberg puts it, "I'm a New Yorker, and New Yorkers know a con when we see one!"whatthefunk
- I was thinking about job creators everywhere, not just Trump, and the issues and issues regarding businesses paying taxes********
- people always seem to think negatively towards financial losses. While no one likes to lose, its better to think of them as learning experiences.********
- His losses would in turn be other people's gain, and yet he suffered more losses than anyone due to the corruption of the big banking system.********
- #WHORE FIRST LADY