religion
religion
Out of context: Reply #1846
- Started
- Last post
- 3,482 Responses
- ApeRobot-3
- The second one's attire doesn't offend and I don't see thousand of the first ones, from another culture entirely, walking around my city?detritus
- Niqabs and Burqas offend me. So fuck?
Get out of my country with that shit.detritus - the first one is a secret lesbian the second is a secret terrorist.hotroddy
- because nun's habits aren't required wearing for all women, just nuns in conventsscarabin
- I judge them both equally for adhering to stupid ass interpretations of ancient books, who dictate how they should dress. Therefore question is meaningless.monospaced
- yup I'm an equal opportunity judger. They're both morons lol_niko
- none "offends", but media is showing us that the second one might blow your ass up, run you over, or stab you with a knife.********
- yeah, if you're the kind of asshat who thinks Trump is the mediamonospaced
- one represents a personal choice to worship a dead guy, the other represents forced child marriages********
- in order to worship another dead guy.
but when right side is a personal choice, people still thinks its forced child marriages.pango - people just seem to be offended so easily in general.pango
- No it's not a personal choice for the women living under Sharia law. If Sharia law doesn't offend all your sensibilities than there is something wrong with you********
- Ummm... women still wear niqab in North America. There are no laws enforcing women to wear niqab.pango
- Please show me examples where women is forced to wear niqab in North America.pango
- There is such a thing called religious "freedom". I think it's a huge thing in your country.pango
- Dude. Christian bible offends me equally. You don't see me throwing a hissy fits. Please spend more effort and time to understand things ok.pango
- Reread my comment. I clearly stated that I was talking about women living under Sharia law. Talking to you is like trying to reason with a park bench********
- talking to you is like talking to a potato. You can't just generalize everything. just because someone is wearing niqab doesn't mean they are being forcedpango
- under sharia law. how much do you know about sharia law anyway. quit assume you know everything. potato.pango
- Reread my comment. I clearly stated that I was talking about women living under Sharia law. Talking to you is like trying to reason with a park bench********
- Reread my comment. I clearly said that people wearing niqab doesn't always have to be forced under sharia law. potato.pango
- right, and the people who wear them are 1st and second generation immigrants from countries where they are forced to wear them, what's your point pango, are you********
- being contrary for luls********
- Does any countries in North America enforces sharia law? You are making a here already assumption every single one of them is being forced.pango
- the people who wear them are 1st and second generation immigrants from countries where they are forced to wear them********
- What a potato.pango
