Politics

Out of context: Reply #23000

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 33,773 Responses
  • fadein116

    • You have to donate $10,000 to the ADL to voice these types of opinions according to Maggiano's
      ********
    • What opinions?monospaced
    • woteva treva.fadein11
    • oh yes, even truth and facts that are considered images of "hate" must donate $10,000 to the ADL according to Maggiano's
      ********
    • Nobody has to do jack shit according to that restaurant or anyone. They did this because they hate white supremacists and want the cash to fight them instead.monospaced
    • omg. Question. Do you use an online Gibberish Generator for each of your posts? Is this all some elaborate joke for a high school graduation assignment?kona
    • omg, are you really bothered that the proceeds from the racist assholes went to the ADL? If so, why?monospaced
    • Yes they're right. The goal of the ADL is to destroy the Supremacy Clause that makes this great nation by charging folks a fee to have a voice.
      ********
    • Who did they charge, exactly?
      ********
    • Are you suggesting that the ADL was like, "Ok, you guys can say that stuff, but you have to pay us, first?" omg, your logic is ridiculous.
      ********
    • When the ADL accepted Maggiano's $10,000 "donation" to run their business as a restaurant, you have to see the sign of extortion being made onto business.
      ********
    • If you build an institution that accepts money to fight "hate" in the form of free speech. In return they will seek to destroy you, unless you pay.
      ********
    • pmsl. you are a real nutjob omg.fadein11
    • You are so insane omg. It wasn't a fee. It's not a fee to avoid destruction. You must be a moron if that is what you think a charitable donation is.monospaced
    • And still you don't realize this has nothing to do with freedom of speech, a right you have consistently misunderstood.monospaced
    • Serious question. Where are you being fed this bullshit story omg? Did you read it on RT or did you come up with this garbage all by your hateful self?monospaced
    • A charitable fee would not have happened with under scrutiny of CNN. Maggiano's was forced to "donate" $10,000 at that point.
      ********
    • No they weren't. No fee exists for inadvertently hosting a white supremacist dinner. Derp.monospaced
    • Mono, now you're being a denialist now. It is freedom of speech being targeted. Especially when provoking the president to intervene.
      ********
    • I'm merely looking at the folks who are representing the Supremacy Clause, it's history, and who they were written for. My views are far from hate.
      ********
    • You obviously do not understand extortion on a social level. Or you're just being a denialist again.
      ********
    • There was no speech being suppressed. There was no fee extorted. Once again are you getting this from somewhere or just making it up yourself?monospaced
    • The restaurant simply didn't like that they hosted this gang of fucknuts, so decided to distance themselves. That's it.monospaced
    • The president-elect had to informally suppress the alt-right group viewpoint. The consequences for Maggiano's had they not made a "donation" would be scrutiny.
      ********
    • I'm just reading in between the lines. Understanding the alt-right motivations under the constitution.
      ********
    • Also referencing this article.http://www.c...
      ********
    • http://www.cnn.com/2…
      ********
    • The president elect didn't have to do that at all. So stupid if you. and yes the scrutiny from aligning with hate groups is deserved. Why does that bother you?monospaced
    • The president elect didn't have to, but the consequences would have been dire to pulling the country together.
      ********
    • So you think it was deserving that a restaurant who was not originally aligned with a groups beliefs should have to "donate" to a cause they may not care about?
      ********
    • I'm not bothered. Or maybe I should be bothered by the hidden injustices disguised in sheep's clothing. Tila Tequila exposing more than just her body.
      ********
    • Once again. They didn't have to. I know your entire rant relies on this, but you're simply wrong.monospaced
    • If the ADL takes that money, then they are extortionists.
      ********
    • That is some moron logic. Approaching yuri level of stupid. Do you know how idiotic that sounds? It's like you don't even know what the word means. omfgmonospaced

View thread