Politics

Out of context: Reply #22111

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 33,773 Responses
  • ********
    0

    Fuck going through my picks right now for local offices. Its like a chess game. No one that I can really support. So i am carefully picking people who will balance each other out with separate interests from all parties. Be so much easier to decide if there was good people running.

    • i see what you mean with that whole balancing out thing, but it seems they just hold each other back getting nothing done
      ********
    • but really what should they be getting done? remember clinton was decent because he was busy chasing ass. the ppl who want to build monuments are scary
      ********
    • currently, locally, the ppl are focused on everything but the simple tasks of balancing budgets, and making sure basic public stuff works.
      ********
    • perhaps a gridlock on progressive policies for future resumes will force ppl to finally look at basics, or buy time until another election...
      ********
    • but for real I have no idea if any ppl are good. so many philosophical inconsistencies. makes u wonder if theyre just saying what they think u want to hear
      ********
    • This first time will probably be my last. I really think johnson is an honest guy with more sense and understanding of socractic ignorance than anyone ive seen
      ********
    • im really only voting because of him. he tried he had some good steam. weld was a good pick even if he might be to much of a politician. and him getting media
      ********
    • steam rolled for the dumbest gaffes ever than playing stein as a legit option against him... he needs a validation vote even if its not for a win
      ********
    • also 5 special policy issues 4 to say no on for stupid tax increases/individual liberty issues 1 yes for weed for individual liberty. im not a fan of weed.
      ********

View thread