Politics

Out of context: Reply #21452

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 33,773 Responses
  • monospaced1

    Only a couple of daily newspapers have publicly endorsed Donald Trump for president. One is in Missouri, I believe. The other was in my hometown of Santa Barbara, CA.

    Very disappoint.

    • http://www.keyt.com/…monospaced
    • https://media.tenor.…Ramanisky2
    • most papers want to be on the winning teamCygnusZero4
    • This doesn't represent the city or community, which has a massive Mexican American voting population.monospaced
    • newspapers don't represent the people, but rather its own business agenda and presidential donations.
      ********
    • https://www.publicin… clearly many journos prefer her
      ********
    • obviously, because most intelligent, educated and influential people prefer her ... and that article only proves that they aren't being paid for it eithermonospaced
    • aka those who game the system via special interests. http://libertyblitzk…yurimon
    • the people you all criticized when bernie was around, now flat out support. some one got the derpes!yurimon
    • Oh, so journalists making personal donations to Clinton's campaign is gaming the system? Usually to make that claim it's the other way around, buddy. LOLmonospaced
    • If you showed how Clinton had paid the journalists to donate between $25 and $3,000 (yeah, totally makes no sense), then maybe you'd have a point.monospaced
    • you are assuming there is an intellectual bias, that they are supporting a better candidate and not their interests like any other businessyurimon
    • all of sudden they were able to look over all the bad stuffs and first time in history banks, corps are doing out of their hearts to help us.yurimon
    • How kind. if you follow association of all the major publicity/ controversy it all links political business meshing. im sure you booked marked the researchyurimon
    • so, you're saying a personal donation to Clinton is only done for personal benefit? what on earth are they getting for it do you think?monospaced
    • donation doesnt equal intelligence obviously, or doesnt prove personal interest or broader interest/cooperation of a group.yurimon
    • however it turns a blind eye to the facts of our current special interest crisis. only one candidate in modern time who has a chance is standing up to it.yurimon
    • bible belt inbred morans.fadein11
    • yuri, c'mon, we're talking about regular journalists here, not super pac money, and to be fair, it's a profession that requires a good level of intelligencemonospaced
    • they're getting nothing out of it except some small sense of satisfaction that their donation is going to the candidate they choosemonospaced
    • SB??? really? what paper? That hippie town? I know theres a lot of rich white folks, but I thought they were a little progressive.sofakingback
    • The Santa Barbara News-Press. Yes, a very liberal town with tons of Mexican Americans. The Clintons actually live in town, so this is a slap in the face.monospaced

View thread