Westworld

Out of context: Reply #47

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 236 Responses
  • prophetone0

    prophetone 0Permalink
    UpvoteDownvote
    Flag
    • Plausible.DRIFTMONKEY
    • 3rd ep makes it not plausible right?inteliboy
    • If two timelines does it not work?prophetone
    • No because then it wouldn't be based on the book anymore.monospaced
    • HBO don't need no books, but, we will seeeeeeprophetone
    • considering it's based on a michael crichton book, and the feature film Westworld from the '70s, and Crichton is involved still, I say they domonospaced
    • "and Crichton is involved still" ... hmmm.
      Michael Crichton (1942 - 2008)      ETM
    • And considering it was only a script, never a book, written (and directed) by Crichton, you make no sense, mono.ETM
    • that's right ... his name is on the credits on the show, that's what I was going off ofmonospaced
    • Yes, they did extend that courtesy as it's his creation. I'm sure his name association doesn't exactly hurt, either.ETM
    • I'm just saying that it's likely not a time travel thing because that would be a massive departure from what this is supposed to be about, originallymonospaced
    Show [[ numHiddenNotes ]] more notesAdd Note
    SaveCancel

View thread