Politics
Politics
Out of context: Reply #21272
- Started
- Last post
- 33,773 Responses
- dasmeteor2
- women got smarts, men are morans.lowimpakt
- Men pay more income tax and women pay more sales tax (because they buy more) Men more valuable for building/maintaining a societyrobotron3k
- Women are mooch from the "patriarchy" they rail against. It really is a gender race and this seems to prove it, partially.robotron3k
- That's because you wrote off Hillary as a viable candidate the day she was born female.monospaced
- Facts are there has never been a 20th century society that has been built, maintained and protected by women. I'm just no into myths and fads.robotron3k
- Bill also "opened to door" for her, political, so to speak. And she's been a paper tiger for 30 yrs. "Women, kids, Women kids" repeat...robotron3k
- I know you may agree on only one thing mono, that we had better choices.robotron3k
- I don't agree with you that being female is a disqualification for leadership. If you're saying I agree that the candidates both are awful choices, then yes.monospaced
- Strategically they will be releasing electoral college results way before the election so dissuade T voters even more. She'll have 4 years then Pence 2020 lol.robotron3k
- Only one things left on the table to happen, rampant voter fraud.robotron3k
- A female leading a company is one thing, many great examples of that. But building, maintaining, protecting a 20th century society there are none.robotron3k
- Women receive the benefits of patriarchy, they are not victims and held down like they want people to believe. Esp. In the west.robotron3k
- In 3rd world an Asian countries women go for it. Western women make easy life decisions, they could be powerful but take it easy.robotron3k
- Start by reading the classic book The Manipulated Man by German Esther Villar. Or listen for 5 minutes: http://bit.ly/2dZhhq…robotron3k
- you're not going to school me, educate me or change my stance on the idea that a woman can be a great leader, evermonospaced
- at one point no woman had ever led a global company either, and there were lots of men, just like you, who used that as a bullshit reason for objecting to itmonospaced
- I look for fact mono, matriarchal societies have always existed and women have been bosses. It will take 1000 year or breeding for a woman to create a society.robotron3k
- But in the West, a woman's biggest concern is "how does my hair look?"robotron3k
- wow, robo, wowmonospaced
- so you're doubling down that Hillary is, by default, unfit to be President because she's female, and the possibility of a fit woman is at least 1000 years awaymonospaced
- do you say this stuff, out loud, to actual living women that you know, or do you reserve it for posts like this?monospaced
- But she will win mono, not to worry. The electoral college is in the bag. Now she and media has to convince the population she's the one, that's their challengerobotron3k
- sure, but that's really a separate issue from the fact that you can't even admit she's a viable candidate because she's femalemonospaced
- whatevermonospaced
- Ohh monorobotron3k
- really?monospaced
- The fact that this map actually started a #RepealThe19th hashtag is proof positive Trump and his supporters are disgusting.kona
- robotron3k seems like you are just hating on women because they happen to vote Democrat.yuekit
- There have been plenty of woman leaders...U.S. is behind the curve in this regard.yuekit
- They didn't "build" societies because almost all societies were created hundreds or thousands of years ago when women were treated as second class.yuekit
- "Men more valuable for building/maintaining a society"
Absolute Bullshitlowimpakt
