Politics

Out of context: Reply #21239

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 33,773 Responses
  • utopian1

    utopian 1Permalink
    UpvoteDownvote
    Flag
    • bin bin bong
      ********
    • They're denying Bill Clinton as a working example of whether or not superficial issues on character can define a good president or not. why?
      ********
    • Either Bill Clinton was a good or bad president. Color his face with marker and ask yourself the same question again.
      ********
    • He was a good President, not so good husband. Either way, he's not running and is irrelevant (beyond Trumpsters deflections and excuses)formed
    • Are you not going to base your decisions on good examples that have worked in the past?
      ********
    • Your question is whether or not Trump will make a good president or not. So previous examples should be relevant
      ********
    • yet some hot girl in a purple dress is relevant. She's also not running for president.
      ********
    • Even if Hillary is your champion, it's useless if you're not one of rational thought.
      ********
    • Ohhhhh omgRamanisky2
    • omg!
      ********
    • If we're going to base your decisions on good examples that have worked in the past, let's talk Trump then. Because since I can remember,kona
    • Trump has consistently been in the news for shady deals and business tactics, sued more times than I can count, been caught up in umpteen controversies,kona
    • Gone through 3 wives, all of which he's cheated on, one raped btw. He's filed for bankruptcy 3 times, lost almost a billion in a year and has paid 0 in taxes.kona
    • And now, you think he's going to be a stand-up guy fighting 'for the people'? LOFLkona
    • so you're saying Bill Clinton was a bad example a good president then...
      ********
    • shady deals, business tactics, issues with the law, marital issues, money problems happen to be equal issues for both Trump and Hillary.
      ********
    • if fighting for the people is your reason of choice, then you should ask the military and law enforcement for their opinion
      ********
    • military and law enforcement prefer hillarymonospaced
    • was because of the useless wars she put them in? or putting them down for trying to do their jobs?
      ********
    • maybe it was arming the enemy with over $600m of weapons that made them like Hillary.
      ********
    • smhmonospaced
    • or in another light you can suggest these wars are necessary... law enforcement knows what they're talking about... and Hillary fucked up, she won't do it again
      ********
    • .. and at least thats $400m better than Trump's $1b loss. though there's the issue of bloodshed.
      ********
    • you talk like Trump would usher in an era of world peace and end all bad things from happening instantly just by standing theremonospaced
    • and you've have somehow ignored all the shit he's said related to nuclear capabilities and use, here and globallymonospaced
    • or what said he plans to do to get oilmonospaced
    • the internet is amazing. maybe we can put all the rockets together and form one big space ship. not sure if clean coal is a good option though.
      ********
    Show [[ numHiddenNotes ]] more notesAdd Note
    SaveCancel

View thread