Politics
Politics
Out of context: Reply #21162
- Started
- Last post
- 33,773 Responses
- ********-7
Susan Sharon: It's 100% Italian cashmere and light as a feather.
Carrie: God, I love it! It's a cashmere-acle!
Samantha: That can be a turn-on.
Miranda: Sure, but now he wants me to reciprocate and I can't. I never could.
Carrie: Why not?
Miranda: Because sex is not a time to chat. In fact, it's one of the few instances in my overly articulated, exceedingly verbal life where it is perfectly appropriate -- if not preferable -- to shut up. And now suddenly I have to worry about being stumped for conversation? -- no thank you.
Charlotte: Just keep talking about his big cock.
Samantha: Correction -- his big, beautiful cock.
Carrie: We're using the C-word now?
Miranda: I can't use adjectives- locker room banter********
- are fictional tv characters running for president?severian
- ohh omgRamanisky2
- if you think this was just about using the C word, then you'd be sorely mistakenmonospaced
- I mean, saying "pussy"monospaced
- Lulz. What is this argument, exactly? "But but but, they say bad stuff on TV!!!"********
- I think it is fantastic that you spent the time finding (and typing) this quote and the image to go with it. Amazing.face_melter
- No one said people dont talk like trump, but they arent being recorded, and they arent running for president. It looks REALLY bad. No way to wiggle out of this.CygnusZero4
- Yes its banter, but he is also talking about sexual assault. He says when he sees beautiful women he just starts kissing and grabbing them.CygnusZero4
- The willful disregard that conversations about sexual preference, attractiveness, and sexual history are vastly different thanmg33
- I would vote for hillary if she spoke this way.hotroddy
- Its impossible to make this look good, or spin it in a way that makes it seem ok for a presidential candidate to say something like this. Campaign OVER.CygnusZero4
- conversations about intent to commit or sexual assault speaks volumes about the intelligence of the person who can't quite make the distinction between the two.mg33
- I'm sorry omg, but I hold individuals whom are trying to be President to a higher standard than I do fictional TV characters chatting about consensual sex.kona
- ^ +1 million billion.mg33
- Are you seriously suggesting that people need to judge who is more rapier than the other? I'll leave that for the courts, not presidential elections.********
- as far as I'm concerned, both sides are equal in being rapey. So I'm not trying to pick out my favorite rapist kona.********
- I render the issue null so I can move onto more important issues.********
- Ohhh omgRamanisky2
- locker room banter
