Politics

Out of context: Reply #21162

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 33,773 Responses
  • ********
    -7

    Susan Sharon: It's 100% Italian cashmere and light as a feather.
    Carrie: God, I love it! It's a cashmere-acle!
    Samantha: That can be a turn-on.
    Miranda: Sure, but now he wants me to reciprocate and I can't. I never could.
    Carrie: Why not?
    Miranda: Because sex is not a time to chat. In fact, it's one of the few instances in my overly articulated, exceedingly verbal life where it is perfectly appropriate -- if not preferable -- to shut up. And now suddenly I have to worry about being stumped for conversation? -- no thank you.
    Charlotte: Just keep talking about his big cock.
    Samantha: Correction -- his big, beautiful cock.
    Carrie: We're using the C-word now?
    Miranda: I can't use adjectives

    • locker room banter
      ********
    • are fictional tv characters running for president?severian
    • ohh omgRamanisky2
    • if you think this was just about using the C word, then you'd be sorely mistakenmonospaced
    • I mean, saying "pussy"monospaced
    • Lulz. What is this argument, exactly? "But but but, they say bad stuff on TV!!!"
      ********
    • I think it is fantastic that you spent the time finding (and typing) this quote and the image to go with it. Amazing.face_melter
    • No one said people dont talk like trump, but they arent being recorded, and they arent running for president. It looks REALLY bad. No way to wiggle out of this.CygnusZero4
    • Yes its banter, but he is also talking about sexual assault. He says when he sees beautiful women he just starts kissing and grabbing them.CygnusZero4
    • The willful disregard that conversations about sexual preference, attractiveness, and sexual history are vastly different thanmg33
    • I would vote for hillary if she spoke this way.hotroddy
    • Its impossible to make this look good, or spin it in a way that makes it seem ok for a presidential candidate to say something like this. Campaign OVER.CygnusZero4
    • conversations about intent to commit or sexual assault speaks volumes about the intelligence of the person who can't quite make the distinction between the two.mg33
    • I'm sorry omg, but I hold individuals whom are trying to be President to a higher standard than I do fictional TV characters chatting about consensual sex.kona
    • ^ +1 million billion.mg33
    • Are you seriously suggesting that people need to judge who is more rapier than the other? I'll leave that for the courts, not presidential elections.
      ********
    • as far as I'm concerned, both sides are equal in being rapey. So I'm not trying to pick out my favorite rapist kona.
      ********
    • I render the issue null so I can move onto more important issues.
      ********
    • Ohhh omgRamanisky2

View thread