Politics
Politics
Out of context: Reply #20669
- Started
- Last post
- 33,773 Responses
- monospaced0
Since Hillary is suffering from several incurable, chronic, life threatening conditions and will probably die any moment now: Warren's more of what I picture as the first female president.
- yeah all about the looks mono. explains how designers make choices. looks acceptable, cause of looks.yurimon
- I wasn't referring to her looks, dumbass.monospaced
- like a jill stein lite. some of the policies she supports are quite asinine. she has definitely been educated incorrectly or says anything like trump for votes.********
- they are too weak.yurimon
- @ deathboy, your opinions about her education are nothing more than that (feelings, obviously), and she has never said anything just to win a vote.monospaced
- anyway, I think she's pretty amazing how she's going after the corporate corruption (banks)monospaced
- not feelings. a summation based on the generalization of a handful of her stances. she is clearly and logically incorrect on many********
- and making a guess if she believes it she learned incorrectly. or shes being a politician and choosing by what gets her votes and makes her stand out. or both********
- most people nowadays don't have critical thinking skills and they just repeat from the experts they choose to believe. why u sell yourself as an expert********
- sorry you think that. Must be why you are all about the trumpmonospaced
- That man and his band of followers must be real critical thinkers.monospaced
- mono is a critical thinker. his thinking is in critical condition. yeah bouy.yurimon
- im not a trump supporter. but i will say he can get emotional responses. he understands peoples propensity for entertainment and trivial shit********
- much better at grandstanding than warren. she could learn a thing or too from him next time she wants a public forum to to say shame shame********
- if she had any tact she'd see some hypocrisy with herself and peers with how many bad incentive programs have been created by them and what their punishment was********
- she'd have been better suggesting they be fucked to death. than she would have gotten better headlines and more attention********
- A 'summation' of a 'generalization' of a 'handful' of stances - super scientific of you, well done.BuddhaHat
- 'most people don't have critical thinking skills' - she's a professor of law at Harvard, you monumental hobnob.BuddhaHat
- 'he gets emotional responses' - 'cos you need people that respond emotionally in control of nuclear weapons. Genius.BuddhaHat
- 'bad incentive programs' - the CPFB is not about incentives, it is about Protecting Consumers' Finances. Neither side has supported it much.BuddhaHat
- directly quoting a satirical cartoon suggesting that 'fucking people to death' is the right way to get positive attention on a subject. Yet again, genius.BuddhaHat
- summation is what cliff notes are buddha. would u like me to right a multipage post on all her positions? would you read it?********
- professor of law at harvard means absolutely nothing, and only reflects poorly on harvard brand image. dont fall for such associations.********
- incentives... lowering interest rates too all time lows and doing QE, subsidies for so many things. again summation because that is sooo long.********
- person sets up a well intended incentive program that gets gamed by lots of greedy people. gets caught pays the fined on top of reimburses and has to listen********
- "At Harvard, Warren became one of the most highly cited law professors in the United States." so an entire profession thinks she's an idiot, then...BuddhaHat
- to her hypocrisy for the public grandstanding. props for him giving her the time of day. id tell her to fuck off.********
- that means other people of significant legal standing cited her interpretations of statutory law in the application of law in other cases and researchBuddhaHat
- your assertion seemingly runs contrary to realityBuddhaHat
- just because its satire doesn't mean there isnt a lesson. the more obviously obtuse statement the more attention because its easy. attention sells as clicks********
- a summation of a generalization of a handful of things, however... well geeze, that could just about be interpreted any old way, couldn't it?BuddhaHat
- she is doing what she does for a political show and dance routine. if she had balls and wanted to double down she could try to step up her game********
- well i just wrote all that and didnt know u responded in between. again a terrible medium for real discussion, just short bytes of entertainment********
- oh yea i don't base any info on others opinions. only my own. this is that expert thing i mentioned. we are told only to believe others with standing********
- we so often remove reason and replace it with opinion of a so called expert. bush, obama also did law at harvard, it really means nothing********
- she wants equal rights for gays but wants to give women extraordinary rights? no hypocrisy there. fuckin harvard smarts, probably a professor said so********
- protecting consumers from exploitative business practices is a political song & dance? to whose benefit? no politician wants to see the CPFBBuddhaHat
- in operation because it goes after the people that give them money. GOP opposed her nomination, and she only got in from public supportBuddhaHat
- she did it because her experience as an expert in bankruptcy laws showed her that the consumer was getting the short end of the stick, in a patternBuddhaHat
- of repeated exploitation. given how much money these financial institutions give in political donations, in what way was that a 'political' song & dance?BuddhaHat
- no im ok with the fines. it was the grandstanding against the CEO. and the hypocrisy calling him out for a well intended plan that failed. that is par for gov********
- and her policies are full of hypocrisy. shes a career politician who probably couldnt do shit in the private sector********
- people with less fortitude and without the record to back themselves up have folded under the kind of pressure she has been underBuddhaHat
- well they got fined and the forum had 0 merit. why do it at all? she was posturing for her career********
- She has built a career in education and the public sector. There would be plenty of people in those sectors that couldn't do shit in the private sector.BuddhaHat
- what's your point?BuddhaHat
- she has been under 0 pressure. make her responsible for her behavior and see what happens. its why shes public sector. you dont have to be responsible for anyth********
- but with 2 degrees in science and law, a position of professor at Harvard, and a deep understanding of the intricacies of finance, I'd say she's employable.BuddhaHat
- 0 pressure? so nobody wanted her to run for the presidency? nobody tried to stop her from running for the CPFB? nobody at all? not the entire GOP Senate?BuddhaHat
- http://www.politicus…BuddhaHat
- republicans cited a lack of 'checks and balances on the CFPB' in blocking her nomination... nomination for an office that would allow her to crack downBuddhaHat
- on major financial institutions in the absence of similar 'checks and balances' in the financial system.BuddhaHat
- again degrees are meaningless. and the rest is meaningless. false associations and logical fallacies. look at what she has done. thats all that matters to me********
- so again, your assertion that she was under 0 pressure is seemingly without grounding in realityBuddhaHat
- she was a huge asshat today. her policies are terrible and hypocritical. to me she might have paper but learned nothing********
- lets focus on her feminist beliefs if you would like because that seems to be a big differentiator for her brand********
- ok, so now you don't appreciate her behaviour? did she indirectly or directly incite violence against someone? Or did she call someone in a positionBuddhaHat
- of responsibility to show some actual form of accountability for actions that have cost consumers millions of dollars?BuddhaHat
- ... ok what pressure is she under. specifics? you assumed it i saw none. i should ask you to clarify********
- degrees are meaningless... tell that to the majority of employers in the US today... you'll be letting them in on a secret!BuddhaHat
- oh wait i see the other things above... realtime would be nice..********
- whether or not they impart knowledge to the student is distinct from whether or not employers perceive educational qualifications as being of value.BuddhaHat
- ugh its late. i wont look at her past. but im sure she is as equal in moving up the political ladder as anyone else.********
- have u ever thought about the system of control created by gov+schools and licensing or degrees and protectionsim********
- they are 100% absolutely useless. You get a degree do u get a senior position, or an internship, than junior than real work experience up.********
- id love to tell the majority its a scam, but you have indoctined people who bought in already, and gov+banks pushing the idea its a must********
- if warren want to hurt banks she should go after the gov backed student loans********
- will anyone who paid 50k+ for a journalism degree really want to believe he wasted his money? or will he judge other based on wether they did what he did.********
- which is another thing warren is completely wrong on. her stance son edcuation shows me she only learned what they wanted her too********
- im going to bed buddha. have a goodnight you hobnob********
- oh wait had this thought brushing teeth. shes against "predatory" loaning but backs gov backed loans. creates a bad incentive for banks to take advantage********
- an example where she is the ceo she railed against.no seppuku for her but asks it of others********
- She did go after student loans...
http://www.nytimes.c…BuddhaHat - http://www.commondre…BuddhaHat
- she went after for profit colleges, not the gov backed student loans which create perverse incentives to loan to anyone********
- she blamed only for profit colleges, not the banks nor the gov who created the programs, nor the people who took out the loans, nor non profits...********
- and shes probably a pawn of lobbyists or special interest just tightening control on the monopoly of education. plus more ppl in college, less unemployment********
- if she was smart you think she would realize her hypocrisy? or is it she doesn't care?********
- that's just entirely not true. she didn't blame only for profit colleges, can't you even see the URL I linked? She want after the Dept of Education.BuddhaHat
- ok i read them. it was worse than i thought. she just just making noise. shes just being mad as hell at everything. shes terrible at her job.********
- i almost think shes trying to say the message of free school for everyone. profit motives bad when education involved. is that right? thats what it sounds like********