Politics
Politics
Out of context: Reply #20620
- Started
- Last post
- 33,773 Responses
- monospaced2
- got my voteRamanisky2
- yupdbloc
- for easily fooled yes.yurimon
- not fooled yuri, funny... funny. no fooling, just funny.fadein11
- trump is the candidate for the easily fooled, stewart is for the educated, smart and reasonable votersmonospaced
- ^the simple fact that yuri can't process that common sense logic says no one in their right mind should even try and debate with him.kona
- jon is not running. trump is not perfect. only truth i see in his campaign is he patriotic to the country. that would be a change from the bush era.yurimon
- jon stewart is an actor. he said it in the beginning if people come to him as info anything other then entertainment its a sad thing.yurimon
- And yet, he'd make a better president than Trump any day. Turns out actors can be well informed and intelligent people too.monospaced
- hes intelligent like lenin was intelligent. basically. he is part of the illusion paradigm you subscribe to. so good luck with your celeb worshipyurimon
- Jon Stewart is not an illusion and neither is the paradigm you are assuming I prescribe to. I don't worship him either, just know that he would be a great pres.monospaced
- Far better than Trump, who is the worst type of celebrity whose entire campaign is about painting a false illusion of bullshit and hate that you prescribe to.monospaced
- Why are you arguing with a person who literally dreams about editing his own posts?BonSeff
- thats cause im on here to much. its all an illusion in every way mono. jon, trump. its abstract assumption based on abstract assumptions.yurimon
- Reagan was an actor dipshit. Reagan... the Republican messiah President... was an ACTOR. So what does it matter Stewart being an actor?kona
- And STILL Stewart would be a better president than trump. Far more real, smart and informed than trump. It's that simple.monospaced
- Trump is a reality show actor....even worse.dbloc
- they both the same abstraction, you just like one over the other. the basis of your decision is the same. abstract assumptions made into a conclusion.yurimon
- And still he'd be a better president than trump. You have made no case to refute that. Sorry.monospaced
- I like him more than trump because he's a better human being in every way possible. Smarter, more informed, more relevant and better spoken.monospaced
- You only like trump because he's a botched abstraction of a human, and you relate to that. He speaks at an iq level of potato. Not surprising you worship him.monospaced
- At least Jon Stewart lives in reality and actually can actually discuss he issues in a real, global level. Trump we know can't.monospaced
- yupmoldero
- JS is a pretty bright guy, Trump is a good entertainer but that's all, his "ideas" are beyond laughable, he can't talk about a single thing in realityformed
- remind me how tv and abstract reality narration and comedy is reality again. jesus. do you think?yurimon
- i dont think you know jon well enough and mistake charisma for intelligence. a phrase there is a sucker born every minute comes to mind.yurimon
- Not only do I think, I'm 100% correct. Stewart would be a great president, and much better than Trump in every way. He's not just charismatic, he's smarter too.monospaced
- You can't really argue that.monospaced
- i dont think so. his joke are made for a more liberal mind, like most extreme view points not based on facts but assumption. i dont see how playing on peoplesyurimon
- fallacies though maybe intelligent would product an effective policy.yurimon
- His jokes are not for liberal minds, they are for smart, educated minds of people with real senses of humor about reality. Nothing extreme whatsoever.monospaced
- Not only are his views based on facts, they would be a backbone of policies that would be more effective than Trump's in every way. Can't really argue that.monospaced
- It's okay that you don't understand that. Thing is, most people do with IQs over potato. Jon Stewart for president, because he's smarter and better than Trump.monospaced
- his jokes are not based on looking at statistics for sure. his jokes are based on common beliefs, fallacies, assumptions and cultural stereo types.yurimon
- Not really, they're based on more reality than you seem to understand. That's why he'd be a FAR better president than Trump could ever dream of. Fact.monospaced
- if he did jokes based on facts, he would be hated. but when he takes common beliefs it becomes a flattery and people feel a common ground. its basic rapport.yurimon
- Not sure why you're arguing against this. It's just common knowledge among anyone with an IQ over potato, yuri.monospaced
- Also, aren't you leaving?monospaced
- I'd hate for you to spend a second day being triggered over this again.monospaced
- its a hard to sell for people to hear the truth and take on responsibility for the current world. requires introspection. which is opposite of entertainmentyurimon
- AND YET, he'd still be a better president than Trump. Sorry, it's true.monospaced
- He has proven time and again he can step aside from entertainment to be introspective and take responsibility for the current world, unlike Trump.monospaced
- he hasnt proven shit. he hasnt taken any responsibility other then let people wank of their anger, complacency with spending time watching a show.yurimon
- he got rich working for viacom. people like his show. he captured an audience with making jokes about popular fallacies. its good propaganda. people got stressyurimon
- release by laughing on things they thought was true, sat on their asses, did nothing felt they were part of something. you know like a brand experience..yurimon
- but somehow consuming entertainment is going to change the world.hey i like you cause of confirmation bias. it is brilliant.yurimon
- and STILL, he'd be a better presidential candidate and leader than Trump in every way, because Trump is worsemonospaced
- Trump got rich by shitting on people, capture an audience through lies and bad jokes, spreads fallacies and propaganda daily, and is a narcissistic fuck.monospaced
- Stewart doesn't even come close to anything you described, by the way. He's more of a real person than Trump, more connected to realilty. Better candidate.monospaced
- And honestly, do you hear yourself? You're actually arguing FOR Trump, do you realize that?monospaced
- You're getting triggered, AGAIN (this is the 3rd time) over a suggestion that Jon Stewart is funny. It's so pathetic, it's embarrassing. Thanks for the lulz.monospaced
- sure what ever you say. good luck.yurimon
- bye feliciamonospaced
- bye monikayurimon
- that doesn't make sense, and Jon Stewart would be a great president, because he's smarter than you and trump and is a better human being.monospaced
- if you mean he is good at manipulating the public then you are correct. if you think he will be good at policy. nope if he continues to appeal to liberal sensesyurimon
- Guess what? You're wrong. Stewart would be better not because he can manipulate, but because he's smarter and more capable of a person.monospaced
- More knowledgable, more experienced, funnier (obviously), more in tune with reality, and infinitely more intelligent, introspective, adult and equipped.monospaced
- Your attempt at defending trump is really nonexistent. I'm not sure you make any case attacking Stewart in a triggered rage. Give up.monospaced
- im not defending trump. your basing your choice to pic jon because you think he is smart based on his charisma, ability to tap into an audiences perception toyurimon
- get laughs. its just absurd. instead owning the responsibility of intellectua failure in assuming something you have no proof. of. no proof trump will be goodyurimon
- or bad.yurimon
- Nope. Stewart would be a great president and you certainly ARE defending trump every single time you argue against it.monospaced
- The only reason I post it is to watch you get triggered. It's worked too and really exposed your stubborn, bitter hypocrisy at the same time.monospaced
- And in the end, when you say Jon Stewart isn't a good candidate, it just makes you look like a trump apologist. It's so disgusting.monospaced
- And the reason is hat it's painfully obvious to anyone with half a brain that Stewart is twice the man trump is. He would be a great candidate.monospaced
- im not triggered. im chilling in the shade drinking lemonade, just want to see if at some point you could make a valid argument. non so far and counting.yurimon
- you are even going against his own assertion that he is not to be taken serious or used as a measure for reality. that prob the strongest argument yet.yurimon
- in essence you are not arguing against me but going against jon's own words and beliefs. that is how far off your arguments are.yurimon
- yet, you can't show how he isn't more qualified, more intelligent and a better human being than Trump in every way, or why he won't be a better president.monospaced
- and yes, based on the fact that you lost your shit over this image is PROOF BEYOND DOUBT that you are, IN FACT, triggered. Textbook definition.monospaced
- you have no proof of that. he does his job well which is entertain and charisma isnt intelligence, identity politics isnt either.yurimon