investing money
Out of context: Reply #29
- Started
- Last post
- 56 Responses
- ********0
All planning for future is a marketing idea for banks. It simple a con to get your money, and in so doing tying you into there system of control, making you think and do what they say you should for return. All the while using the money to buy influence and power and massive payouts for themselves while hedging their own bets. Makes me wonder how the top 10% would fair without the other 90% money. speculation and sucker bets would probably be less. public would likely be less controlled out of worry of their money. possibly artifical growth may stutter but that would be good. Everything about it has a madison ave vibe reinforceed by gov becuase of self interests of control.
today there is no rational investment, only the investment you can can do that you can see the gains. If your unsure who is winning you are losing. its all about playing by the systems rules and finding loop holes or playing the nuances. today except for a few lucky people the majority of the game is rigged and u providing your funds even if net 1% profit you give such a larger part of control of your lives away. we hate banks and think of them as evil and yet when it comes to idea they can make us money its a good thing. they have us conditioned perfectly to hate them while giving them our futures. its all absurd.
the best way to make money is be successful in business and offer a value for money.
- they should change the term investing to gambling. they assume an investment will net gain, where they assume a gamble will net a loss. and for whom which end?********
- just wait there will be mandatory 401k and investments for OUR best interests eventually with full support of banks and politcians.********
- Given how many people have nothing saved for when they are older, that's not a bad thingformed
- where was that idea born from? what did people do before? is it all based on the idea that you stop working at 65? who started that idea?********
- ill save cash now, but gov monetary policies discourage savings. ill save that money and probably take a couple year retirement and than comeback to work********
- but the fact that the gov discourages savings while saying no one is saving and that you need them, should tell you who's interests are in play********
- they should change the term investing to gambling. they assume an investment will net gain, where they assume a gamble will net a loss. and for whom which end?