Politics

Out of context: Reply #20201

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 33,773 Responses
  • ********
    2

    I don't know why everyone is getting their knickers in a twist. It's obviously rigged for Clinton to win. Trump is only there to cause uproar and division amongst people.

    As if the President actually makes any of the real decisions anyway. There are no sides, just the bullshit illusion of choice and empty promises.

    ********
    2Permalink
    UpvoteDownvote
    Flag
    • only people losing start making excuses like its rigged. nothing is rigged. he's just flat out losing. deal with it bruh.CygnusZero4
    • you are not very intelligent. the president is extremely important to getting things in motion that might not otherwise be, like same sex marriage for exampleCygnusZero4
    • did that get started when bush was in office? hell no. he is a bigot. obama isnt. the president is VERY important.CygnusZero4
    • youre that guy whos team loses the superbowl and is like its fixed! the refs! injuries!!!! excuses excuses lmaoCygnusZero4
    • haha, I live in the UK and couldn't give two flying shits which puppet wins.
      ********
    • The election isn't rigged if everyone gets the opportunity to vote.monospaced
    • Let's hope that the parties don't go too out of their way to suppress voters. That's the closest thing to a rigging as I can recall.monospaced
    • 1) It's all rigged so one person can win
      2) It doesn't matter who wins
      I think you have to pick one of these      yuekit
    • Why? It's rigged, Hillary will win, but I couldn't give a fuck which one wins. Why do I have to pick one?
      ********
    • I don't, you're just clutching at straws to try and shout YOU'RE WRONG. Doesn't matter what you're wrong about but YOU'RE WRONG. Funny
      ********
    • I'm just asking, why go to all that effort to rig the election if it doesn't matter at all who the President is?yuekit
    • You could be right for all I know but those two points seem slightly contradictory.yuekit
    • Well because Hillary is obviously part of the gang and has been for a long time. Trump, they might have a little more trouble with.
      ********
    • you are thinking like a normal person with a conscious yuekit. try to think like something so vile n worse.yurimon
    • the power of the president is to hand select judges.utopian
    • plus most of you getting fanny banged by words are too emotionally invested in trashing one side or another. this would make all your fanny tears to have beenyurimon
    • wasted on rubbish when you could have actually done something that contributes to society you primates.yurimon
    • What makes you think Trump isn't in on the conspiracy? He was friends with the Clintons for years.yuekit
    • In my opinion the only significant change a President could personally be responsible for is exposing the people that are controlling him/her
      ********
    • set, when you say rigged, do you mean to imply the votes won't be counted correctly?monospaced
    • as JFK was seemingly about to do. No way in hell Hillary is going to do that, but at least there is a remote chance that Trump might not play ball.
      ********
    • see vid of the irish man above i posted.yurimon
    • I think Trump probably is in on it, Yuekit, it's a pipe dream to think anyone who makes it that far wouldn't be.
      ********
    • You see the dems went out of their way this year to boo trump at his rally's. That's how rigged it was
      ********
    • omg, that's not what rigged is, that's just standard politics and protestingmonospaced
    • i'm saying you look back, and you see the mindset to show how far Dems will go to win things
      ********
    • Standard politics? for the US maybe. In civilised countries we like to level the playing field by restricting how much candidates and parties can spend. The...Morning_star
    • ...US seems to have a 'whoever's got the most money' approach.Morning_star
    • @morning, the idea of protestors being present during any presidential candidate speech, or for that matter, any public politics, is standard, you know thatmonospaced
    • everyone knows that... protestors show up for everything under the sun they don't likemonospaced
    • there was proof people were hired at some places.yurimon
    • @mono. On the face of it I agree but the genuineness of these protesters is questionable. The 'rent-a-mob' tactic on all sides is undeniable. It's all about $.Morning_star
    • maybe Hillary should step down.
      ********
    • there's no way she can become president, and not be told that she had it rigged the entire time.
      ********
    • That might be a good thing. We're in a time where corruptions are coming to the surface, all over the place. Some things are becoming so obvious that it's...
      ********
    • ...no longer possible to deny it.
      ********
    • Good point Set. It bothers me greatly that in the UK we're rapidly adopting a US style personality politics with policies mattering less and less.Morning_star
    • Its easier to put a spot light on corruption and tough to deny... but heres the harsh reality. Once you expose it, what are you gonna do about it? Nothing.sofakingback
    • We won't do a damn thing. But watch it all play out. we will pout, but won't do a damn thing.sofakingback
    • Gy gets killed by a cop, filmed with audio, nope. Sorry that was a misunderstanding. Move it along.sofakingback
    • A bunch of paid protestors at a rally is not equivalent to rigging an election ... it's not like they converted trump voters over to the Hillary side.monospaced
    • Th blowback of Media support of Hilary is that, if people believe she's leading and will win, lazy Dems not want to vote at all and then Trump will def win...robotron3k
    • @mono. How different is it to the corruption of the unions back in the 60s. Voter intimidation was just the tip of the iceberg?Morning_star
    • yelling at a protest is not voter intimidationmonospaced
    • robo, so the media you're convinced is rigging a Clinton win, and is corrupted by her, is actually going to ensure a definite Trump win? So conflictingmonospaced
    • It is when they're being paid to yell.Morning_star
    • It's pathetic, I agree. But I won't give paid protestors at a competitor's rally — for either side — the credit for swaying votes or rigging the electionmonospaced
    • In the end, they're just protestors, and either they were kicked out, not let in, or they just made the trump fans hate the dems more. They didn't sway votes.monospaced
    • Lol @ set not thinking what happens in US doesn't affect him in the UK...fadein11
    • hah, more juvenile assumptions.
      ********
    • set's got a good point still ... his every day life won't be changed much with a Trump win, and neither would mine for that mattermonospaced
    • probably wouldn't even be different at all from how it is now, should either candidate win, to be honestmonospaced
    • haha yes #apathy - there is a lot of it about in the UK.
      "haha, I live in the UK and couldn't give two flying shits which puppet wins"      fadein11
    • Well done, you quoted what I said and then reaffirmed your juvenile assumptions.
      ********
    • Clearly only capable of thinking in absolutes terms. Stop engaging me, you really can't debate stupid.
      ********
    Show [[ numHiddenNotes ]] more notesAdd Note
    SaveCancel

View thread