Politics

Out of context: Reply #19494

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 33,773 Responses
  • yurimon-5

    https://www.law.cornell.edu/usco…

    it says "anyone".

    once you break it, its a crime regardless of intent. only argument facing the issue is how severe. it would also implicate everyone who communicated with her especially if they knew. this includes all the top usual household names you so grown to love. might spark a constitutional crises because of the level all the way to the top. mean you would hear alot of testimony.

    You loose clearance insta never to get it back.

    yurimon -5Permalink
    UpvoteDownvote
    Flag
    • its considered gov property what ever her communications were. no position for her to delete or select what is labeled private. this adds to the legal fire. ifyurimon
    • things were normal.yurimon
    • It just proves she's CIA, nothing is going to stick to her.robotron3k
    • YuriLaw®utopian
    • Oh okay. One minute she's incompetent and now she's CIA. Funny shit seriously.monospaced
    • Hate it when I loose clearance.BusterBoy
    • but the law clearly states it's all about intent in the very first fucking sentenceGreedo
    • "or any prohibited place" same case as the navy officer but more vast.yurimon
    • you have to read the rest. the statute has elements. its obvious why you would have private server, you have to observe the whole case. mingled email personal,yurimon
    • gov, on private server where you know doesnt have the same security is a no brainier considering the briefing for sec clearance. they not that dumb.yurimon
    • maybe the main difference being that clintion's a civilian and a navy officer isn't, and thus falls under military law, which is harsher than civlian law?Greedo
    • that statute seems to cover the armed forces. not sure its executive branch,yurimon
    • zzzzzzzzuritardfadein11
    • not a coincidence fadein's name starts with an f like fascism.yurimon
    • that's reaching on a pathetic level there, yurimonospaced
    • also, do you know how idiotic it sounds when you call regular people fascists?monospaced
    • mono, even though your words say i dont support fascism you support fascism. EU or in a form of woman running for office. because it just has a different faceyurimon
    • progressive branding under the democratic party. note following neocon foreign policy. hate neocons when white males. love neocons when as cool lookingyurimon
    • black dude or a woman. but def not as white ginger neocon. only pc acceptable narratives with pc words, but same neocon actions are ok because you'll just turnyurimon
    • turn a blind eye. sad, my friend so sad.yurimon
    • wow, that was one disgusting spew of verbal diarrhea you just shit out of your troll mouth you fucking moronmonospaced
    Show [[ numHiddenNotes ]] more notesAdd Note
    SaveCancel

View thread