Politics
Out of context: Reply #19491
- Started
- Last post
- 33,773 Responses
- BusterBoy2
"In looking back at our investigations into mishandling or removal of classified information, we cannot find a case that would support bringing criminal charges on these facts. All the cases prosecuted involved some combination of: clearly intentional and willful mishandling of classified information; or vast quantities of materials exposed in such a way as to support an inference of intentional misconduct; or indications of disloyalty to the United States; or efforts to obstruct justice. We do not see those things here."
Precedent would indicate that there never was any chance of this going to a court.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bu…
http://mediamatters.org/blog/201…
"For months, conservative media figures have attacked Clinton, baselessly accusing her of wrongdoing for receiving State Department emails on her private email account while secretary of state. On February 4, reports emerged that Colin Powell and aides to Condoleezza Rice also used private email accounts when they served under former President George W. Bush, and some of their emails similarly contained information that was retroactively classified."
The only purpose of this investigation has been to give a stick to Republicans with which to beat Clinton with.
- you forgot to add that the attacks were not slanderous. she was aware of protocols, just ignored then. willingly didnt follow procedure for notifying the state.yurimon
- Private email account? how about private email SERVER. She kept the server at her home.PonyBoy
- stalled investigations, Its pretty obvious that she would have paid the price if she was a regular person. + for moron army of virtue signalers on here. imagineyurimon
- what else is possible or can be ignored if she got the presidency. lets reward failure cause we are useful idiots. why not.yurimon
- Nerpy Derpy yUrineRamanisky2