Politics

Out of context: Reply #19468

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 33,773 Responses
  • ********
    3

    http://thehill.com/homenews/camp…

    Prominent Republicans are slowly but surely throwing their support behind Hillary Clinton.

    Many other former Bush officials will privately vote for Clinton this fall, even if they don’t publicly broadcast it in a speech, op-ed or tweet.

    “For me, the answer is no. I can’t support Trump. He has proven he has very little ability to learn. I don’t care if we were on Day One, but now we’re on Day 365 and he doesn’t seem to know much,” said another top George W. Bush appointee, who requested anonymity to speak candidly about the nominee.

    “I will probably hold my nose and vote for Hillary Clinton with no joy or enthusiasm.”

    Then there’s Armitage, George W. Bush’s deputy secretary of State and a former Ronald Reagan appointee, who told Politico that Trump “doesn’t appear to be a Republican” or want to learn about policy issues.

    “Anyone who spent time in and around the White House, especially on national security issues, is appropriately frightened at the idea that you would put that responsibility and authority in the hands of Trump,” Fratto said. “You know how dangerous it would be to have someone that erratic and extreme heading up American policy?”

    “I literally wrote a book about how terrible [Hillary] is,” said Tim Miller, who previously ran an anti-Clinton PAC called America Rising. “That said, Trump is a threat to our party and our republic, so my focus is on stopping him."

    • Happy craynada day mate.
      I have a question fo yae. eh.
      I know you didnt write the article. but what would it take for you to wake up from your slumber mate?
      yurimon
    • Oh hey everyone look, the incoherent troll is trolling again. Zzzzzzzzzzz
      ********
    • what, wake up and vote for a moronic narcissistic Oompa Loompa ?monospaced
    • You think because other cazies decide to vote for someone it justifies that vote? you dont these people really.yurimon
    • WHAT
      ********
    • lol@ her being good for security..yurimon
    • ok, im not going to say anything like my usual "condescending" ways. can you explain to us in your own articulate and brilliantly fine tunedyurimon
    • communications skills. on how and why your approach, reasoning and actions moral, and void of a similar insanity. appreciate your response.yurimon
    • it's clearly more of a struggle for you to write a sentence than it is for me to decipher what you write ... this was particularly hard, I can tellmonospaced
    • dont avoid mono. you are a brilliant orator and verbal master. so it shouldnt take you much of an effort to tell me what i have asked in a form of a question.yurimon
    • and for you to give me an answer.yurimon
    • *chirp.gifyurimon
    • your helmet is loose yUrine ..
      tighten the strap
      Ramanisky2
    • apparently you struggled to form your own question, and in that struggled failed by tripping over your own idiocy it's gotten so bigmonospaced
    • in case you are too fucking stupid to understand, I'll simplify: you failed to ask a question yourself, idiotmonospaced

View thread