religion
Out of context: Reply #1663
- Started
- Last post
- 3,482 Responses
- Morning_star3
_ @ Yurimon re: Science and mysticism being the same
You need to explain in a little more depth your claim, "if you look at quantum physics it's similar to Kabbalah" - because I don't think it is similar in the way you believe it is.
It seems that Kabbalah has no more authority within science than, for instance, Jedi lore. It's based on a mish-mash of multi-God philosophies wrapped up in Jewish context. It's origins are the same as any of the abrahamic philosophies and thus likely to be more political/regal manifesto rather than a key to universal truth.
The similarities you believe exist between science and mysticism have plainly not been proven. I understand the attractiveness of a philosophy that bridges the science religion void but L Ron Hubbard has already tried that and look what happened there.
So, bring it. Show me the evidence.
- kabbalah is not religion. if you look at also the frued, young he borrowed system of archetypes from it for psychology.yurimon
- for quantum physics the concept of dimensions. look into the vedic and kabalah. just look into it.yurimon
- I don't think I said it was. And Frueds been soundly proven as a fraud.Morning_star
- still rooted in those systems if you look into it.yurimon
- also this is good book. http://ecx.images-am…yurimon
- Thanks Yurimon. I shall digest as much as I can.Morning_star
- young? you mean jung********
- quantum physics and kabbalah are not similar in the slightest. you've tried making this claim before based on false informationscarabin
- they share the simular concepts.yurimon