religion
religion
Out of context: Reply #1660
- Started
- Last post
- 3,482 Responses
- ********0
@yurimon
Claiming that something that something is "just semantics" in a discusssion is just stupid. Because isn't a discussion about meaning what we mean anyway? Leave the fluff out of it.- 0o0o, a side note would have sufficed********
- so are you a new member or an old cunt?********
- it is semantics in if you take mysticism n old concepts and reword them in scientific language.yurimon
- your username looks like inside a btw https://www.meb.uni-…yurimon
- No Yuri, what you are doing is comparing a measurable process (Science) to folk tales and ritual practices (Mysticism) and determining that they are somehow...Morning_star
- ...similar. How?Morning_star
- if you look at quantum physics concepts of dimensions its comparable to concepts in some way kabbalah. also concept of a wormholes or blackholes. compare.yurimon
- I can compare apples an oranges, hence the figure of speech. Doesn't neccesarily lend the inferences gleaned any merit though********
- *and********
- its comparable because the difference is use of math but the concept is their just semantics is different.yurimon
- come again********
- Yurimon bro, take your time, where's the fire********
- On his pants!
Sry couldn't help it...pango - Wow... I applaud you guy who never give up. http://i.imgur.com/r…pango
- start with the book. it goes over origins of concepts in science. question did science observe the duality in the universe, proton, nuetron, or did mysticism?yurimon
- there is math in religion. the old stuff that built the pyramids was all in one mysticism even in india there are yogies doing high math from vedic traditionsyurimon
- Yup. Trig was sacred practice, aaaand. . .********
- it was part of one system.yurimon
- Yurimon, what was your drug of choice?********
- 0o0o, a side note would have sufficed