Shooting of the Day
Shooting of the Day
Out of context: Reply #1536
- Started
- Last post
- 2,851 Responses
- d0mino0
At what point does the right to bear arms stop? Are American's allowed pistols? rifles? automatic weapons? grenades? rocket launchers? anti aircraft missiles? nuclear weapons?
Where is the line drawn? And why is that line ok with the NRA and weapon advocates?
- do some research you lazy shit, oh but that's right, you don't actually give a shit and are just spewing uninformed drivel********
- How will you defend yourself against someone with a 2 foot stick, when you are only allowed a 1 foot stick?d0mino
- is that supposed to be some sort of gun allegory. a single 22 bullet can kill, size matters not********
- Where are the limits to your gun rights? Where do they stop? Why is it ok for you to have a right to an automatic pistol but you're ok with not having an RPG?d0mino
- What the fuck are you talking about, what automatic pistol********
- Oops! I don't know the exact terminology for your precious guns. Regardless, do you understand the intent of the question? Where do you draw the line?d0mino
- Are you asking me what the existing laws are or are you just trying to set up a half baked straw man********
- Google the info graphic of logical fallacies, you are mired in sloppy thinking********
- The whole 'oh what good will your pistol be against a sniper rifle' line of bullshit is a complete red herring, just you people trying your hardest to justify w********
- Why honest people like me shouldn't have the tools to deal with the criminals who intend us harm********
- I am genuinely interested in where you draw the line. How far does your right to bear arms extend, and how far do you want / need it to extend?d0mino
- I simply don't understand your position. The reason I ask is to better understand your thinking and the thinking behind of rights advocates.d0mino
- Once again. Look up the laws concerning gun ownership if you don't understand. Shall I Google it for you********
- The laws and your opinion surely differ at some point? You must have an independent viewpoint on the law?d0mino
- There are fifty different states with fifty different takes on gun control and fifty different levels of crime. It isn't something I can explain to you in side********
- notes********
- What is your opinion on your states law? Do you have enough access to weapons? Are you able to defend yourself adequately? Why aren't you answering the q?d0mino
- Because your question was extremely broad and would take an unweildy amount of sidenotes to even scratch the surface. As far as Massachusetts, the state I live********
- in, the right to own firearms is treated like a priveladge, but I am an honest man and I am able to excersize my rights by jumping through a long series of she********
- shenanigan hoops which are set in place by the vocal minority who take the time to affect political change. That's how it is, and I have made due. If the state********
- legislature prevented me from possessing the means to be on equal footing as the criminally intentioned then I would move to a different one. Like NH********
- Having a criminal record makes it difficult though********
- Do you feel as though the equal footing is brought higher because of the legality of weapon access though? Couldn't the bar be incrementally lowered?d0mino
- Surely there must be outlaws who have weapons of a higher quality than what you currently have access to?d0mino
- Yes, because any criminal can just drive to NH and get one. No, because of previous reason stated. And lowered to what, slingshots? Ugh we already had the********
- Who has the bigger weapon convo and I already told you that makes no difference. A bullet is still a bullet and proper training is what makes them accurate and********
- Deadly, not how big or of high quality the gun itself is, but that is a common misconception that the antigun lobby has tryed to scare you with. The 'assault ri********
- rifle' nonsense for instance. It doesn't actually mean anything, its a phrase meant to scare city slickers into some uninformed hysteria. Any more questions********
- Perhaps the middle ground is to limit access to the weapons that have a high rate of fire. Ones that require a bit more skill to operate would make schools safed0mino
- That way, some numbnuts with no training can't spray a class room. Trained citizen with skill can stop him if he rocks up with weapon that req training / skilld0mino
- Automatic firearms are much more difficult to get legally and the near outlawing of them has made them more expensive but no less available. People get what the********
- They want one way or the other. It takes no training to hit something under ten feet********
- do some research you lazy shit, oh but that's right, you don't actually give a shit and are just spewing uninformed drivel