feminist?
feminist?
Out of context: Reply #508
- Started
- Last post
- 682 Responses
- sarahfailin5
I'm as much to blame, because I never post anything serious in here. But it disappoints me that the discussion of feminism here is only about the crazy fringe of feminism.
Bringing up only the ridiculous stuff undermines any serious consideration of the need for feminism, and what it has to add to our lives as *men.* (Cause let's face it, only men are reading this thread.) For ppl who are already educated in it, maybe it doesn't matter as much to only consider the foolishness, but I'm positive there are guys on this blog that have never read a book about feminism.
If there's a will out there only to defame feminism by equating it to madness, well I would call that misogyny, and counter-productive.
- More female feminists need to step up and shout down the lunatic fringe that's ruining the reputation and validity of feminists/feminism.i_monk
- And make up your minds: it's either "the patriarchy hurts us all" or "delicious men's tears". Can't be both.i_monk
- ^Lulz. "It's feminist's job to shout down the lunatics, because we are far too stupid to recognize lunacy on our own."nb
- Not remotely what I said.i_monk
- need more female to really discuss feminism.pango
- The loudest idiots always get the most attentiongilgamush
- will the same go for the religion thread?
*giggle... *runsPonyBoy