Conspiracy of the day

Out of context: Reply #418

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 1,307 Responses
  • GeorgesIV-2

    12:00 mark

    GeorgesIV -2Permalink
    UpvoteDownvote
    Flag
    • Building 7 and the lack of video evidence of plane hitting Pentagon (despite a lot of CCTV capturing the event) are the 2 smoking guns here.fadein11
    • It is such a complex subject to discuss and I don't agree with all the theories but the above just don't fit.fadein11
    • And why as an administration did they not show the Pentagon video evidence to quell the conspiracies. One terrible frame of a blurred shape and an explosion.fadein11
    • CIA confiscated a lot of CCTV footage that day which would have clearly shown an airliner hitting the building. So why not release that?fadein11
    • don't worry man, it's was 19 muslims armed with box cutters,
      - end of story      GeorgesIV
    • I do worry. As I say its such a difficult one to rationalise - Loose Change seemed so powerful back then but now most of it clearly bullshit, yet too manyfadein11
    • unanswered questions still, which could easily be answered. Regardless of that RIP the million plus people who died that morning and after :(fadein11
    • James colbertt did a fine job exposing most of the lies on his podcast, but at this point, I belive those that don't want to see will never see the truth,GeorgesIV
    • yep true dat.fadein11
    • True that. Some people can have the truth smacked in their face and still deny it until the bitter end, to maintain their world view. Fear.
      ********
    • WTC7 was structurally comprised by debri and fire. A clearly visible bulge in the building, creaking and cracking. All signs of collapse.dirtydesign
    • These are facts.dirtydesign
    • dirty, why can't you find any other example of three building collapsing symetrically due to fire or other bollocks, only once/thrice in the history of modernGeorgesIV
    • yep - no tall buuilding has ever collapsed through fire, especially those tiny fires at WT7... minimal damage in that building.fadein11
    • i'm glad you asked, i can explain. most 'tall buildings' have a concrete core surround steel. WTC did not. it only had fireproofing spray.dirtydesign
    • the fireproofing was completely destroyed the impact of a jet full of fuel going 500 miles an hour.dirtydesign
    • also the only 'symmetrical collapse' occurred higher in the buildings where the above compromise happened.dirtydesign
    Show [[ numHiddenNotes ]] more notesAdd Note
    SaveCancel

View thread