Pic of the Day
Pic of the Day
Out of context: Reply #94094
- Started
- Last post
- 131,427 Responses
- Salarrue0
- She wasn't satisfied with just the tip of the head.********
- lol she went balls deep on that shit********
- So is this true too? http://i2.wp.com/mem…Wolfboy
- ^ Haha********
- How old are those?Ben99
- Shitty mainstream archeology would say around 3000yo, because any older doesn't fit in with their precious world view. However, the evidence suggests far older.********
- Tell us about non-mainstream archaeology.i_monk
- In a note on qbn? Please, Sir, refrain from cheap ridicule and peruse the vast world of information out there.********
- What if I stumble upon some shitty mainstream archaeology and don't recognize it for the folly therein?i_monk
- Hilarious********
- I don't see the threat to any "world view" if these turned out to be older than 3,000. The idea of mainstream archaeology having an agenda is funny too.monospaced
- I have a friend who spent a long time studying these on-site. Their whole team was really intent on finding the unbiased truth, but you might considre them mainmonospaced
- As if archaeologists are all hardcore Young Earthers.i_monk
- She wasn't satisfied with just the tip of the head.