religion
religion
Out of context: Reply #1435
- Started
- Last post
- 3,481 Responses
- Morning_star0
"good and evil do exist in the form of order and entropy."
Could you explain a little further Gilgamush.
Good and Evil are subject and relative concepts that, as far as i can see, don't relate directly to either Order or Entropy. I imagine, from your perspective, that Good = Order and Entropy = Evil, but why?
There are a myriad concepts that cover the Good / Evil relationship. One particular favourite of mine does away with Evil completely and centers everything around the unique position of 'Good'.
With regard to your claim that the most balanced approach is the most informed, i'm gonna call horse-shit. The mere existence of an 'expert' in anything makes that argument invalid.
Welcome to QBN by the way.
- * 'subject' should read "subjective"Morning_star
- I think he is referencing natural law.yurimon
- but im not sure if its natural law as far how it would play out in nature.yurimon
- I wouldn't agree with doing away with evil. I'm not sure you what your experience is with subject but There are different forces as far as perceived intent andyurimon
- from an energetic standpoint in how people are effected. Also the anomaly of the psychopath is worth investigating as part of this negative force.yurimon
- I'd say from a universal law point of view perhaps it wouldnt favor good or bad as long as whoevers actions are in accordance with natural law.yurimon
- What is 'Evil'? How do you measure it? Can i buy it? Are animals 'Evil' or is it a purely human construct? Do ISIS believe they are evil?Morning_star
- Like cause and effect for example. like doing nothing waiting to be saved is prob the best example while evil is in organized group action for a planned outcomeyurimon
- obvious advantage doesn't favor those who dont act in proper accordance with universal law. what you think?yurimon
- I gotta get to work, I'll follow up with y'all later on********
- good/evil still remains subjectivemonospaced
- From what i understand, Universal law must be presented in a mathematical way. Have you a formula or link to the mathematical formula for evil?Morning_star
- as for the expertise comment, we are talking about theology, something that can be likened to the belief in unicorns if not balanced with rational thought********
- horse shit and invalid arguments? how can anyone argue that having balance is bad, whats yer deal are you upset or something********
- Its not subjective. its like saying male and female is subjective. Its more subtle then most people understand because it has energetic attributes.yurimon
- Its same problem that extreme scientifically minded have in defining consciousness. the properties of a psychopath is a good example of evil physicalyurimon
- in a physical form. if you were going to create a comparison.yurimon
- the negative effect of emotional trauma are very much so understood by science. the mind body connection isn't so showing the physical manifestation of personal********
- -ity disorders is currently not possiable. the causality is well understood though man. trauma=antisocial, chaos=more entropy, never ending cycle of madness unt********
- -ill a balance is reached********
- psychopathy is not a personality disorder. you need to look up what it really is. there is no cure.yurimon
- I don't care about psychobable********
- psychopathy |sīˈkäpəTHē|
noun
mental illness or disorder.pango - sorry to say but both you guys are dumb.yurimon
- definition doesnt express what is in its entirety. its a bigger topic but you both miss the point, but should i expect anything more.yurimon
- Ya I'm dumb because I'm not interested in pschobable semantics. w/e guy********
- thats dumb of you to say because the point wasnt psychology in essence. thats how how smart you are for just picking up on one word in whole range of thought.yurimon
- Monospaced and Son had a baby.yurimon
- Ya whatever bro, u mad********
- Hey i didn't say what it is. Oxford did. Go challenge oxford if you have a different opinion.pango
- You did say we need to look up what it is. so i looked in the dictionary. You just mad cuz you're wrong and it's not what you think it is.pango
- I'm not mad, but i understand pango or you is not going to change in his intelligence. i'm sure pango is a nice guy but i dont think he has intellectual depth.yurimon
- I like how he makes assumptions on topics from just one word in a dictionary that is not accurate in describing certain concepts that were presented earlier.yurimon
- my last post to pango. going to have to ignore till he he becomes brunette.yurimon