why is this not true?
Out of context: Reply #25
- Started
- Last post
- 59 Responses
- Morning_star0
Why is this not true?
The basic facts that Mr Fagan uses are essentially true. The politics and business interests of the era support that. These basic facts are the building blocks he uses to construct a plausible sounding argument for the influence and strategies necessary for an 'illuminati' to exist.
The problem with that big picture 'illuminati' solution is its only one of the possible options. Amongst others, a more likely big picture solution is that the hundreds of opposing agendas from countries and businesses across the globe make the result a bubbling stew of random events.
Much like Orions Belt, it is just perception. If you look at any cluster of stars you will be able construct any dot to dot image you require. The mundane truth of it is, is that it's just random.- I think there is an element in what you say about perception. I wouldnt know how much of the equation it is. I can only put in perspective of individualsyurimon
- blindly following and feeding a system that is really working against their best interest while defending it in like some Stockholm syndrome type manor.yurimon
- Sorry, but I don't see what you see Yuri. It's intriguing, its complex and it's comforting to have someone in charge. But it's not real.Morning_star
- How is that powerful people who write books and have political influence, often move money in the direction and what they write about in some becomes reality?yurimon
- er in some way.yurimon
- Wouldn't you? Look at Rumsfeld, more money than you can shake a stick at BUT its a bi-product of his political and business affiliations. Not the result of a...Morning_star
- ...coordinated secret elite.Morning_star