religion

Out of context: Reply #1349

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 3,191 Responses
  • yurimon-1

    • if "intellectual arguments" threaten your religion, you've got a shitty religionscarabin
    • or at the very most, a religion for stupid peoplescarabin
    • intellect is only one aspect your being. makes you unbalanced if you neglect your other divine aspects of selfyurimon
    • < ofyurimon
    • people get hurt and make choices for or against something? is getting hurt intellectual? I met people who are atheism and have this espectyurimon
    • have this aspect to them. and religious people with a hurt drives them closer as opposed to the latteryurimon
    • However what people receive as spiritual or religious teaching is mostly on crappy side. same as philosophy in atheism.yurimon
    • if your system can't stand up to intellectual scrutiny it only works on stupid people. sorry i messed up your trolling attemptscarabin
    • What is my system? however like i said there elements aside from intellect because you could rationalize yourself into logical fallacies.yurimon
    • fallacies. If someone was abused by a catholic institution n select atheism as an anti thing from pain. how is it intellect?yurimon
    • that's the things you don't need to eat chichfila. there are many alternatives. driving car needs gas.and there arn't that many alternative.pango
    • alternatives. if there are. i bet people would switch.pango
    • < that question rests on whether the individual is intune to the question who they are and why they are here.yurimon
    • no wait... my comment was meant for one post down.pango
    • yurimon said "logical fallacy." DRINK (he doesn't even know it's meaning he just uses the phrase because r thinks it sounds smart)monospaced
    • < thats the bulk of logic, sheeple useyurimon

View thread