Ebola

Out of context: Reply #202

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 396 Responses
  • ********
    0

    The yearly death toll from flu, in the US, is 36,000, and no one blinks or trembles. Not a problem. Why? Because no one in charge said: “epidemic.”

    The World Health Organization (WHO) claims that, globally, there are between 3 and 5 million cases of ordinary flu every year, and between 250,000 and 500,000 people die. Ho-hum. Pass the salt. Again, no one says “epidemic.”

    But in the spring of 2009, with just 20 cases of Swine Flu, WHO declared a level-6 pandemic, its highest danger category. And people started buying bottled water and canned goods.

    Of course, to make that pronouncement, WHO had to change its definition of pandemic. Widespread death and severe debilitation were no longer required.

    If Ebola really was as big a problem as the media would have you believe, they would have shut down air travel from Sierra Leone. They didn't.

    People in Africa and Sierra Leone are continually reported to not believe Ebola exists. There are many reports of people getting symptoms only after being given vaccines and a man was caught by a mob putting formaldehyde into the water supply of their village. When caught he said that he was paid to do it.... formaldehyde when consumed in water causes similar symptoms to the reported Ebola symptoms.

    This is nothing but a fear campaign in order for big pharma to make billions on vaccines and possibly to bring martial law into the states.

    They practiced martial law in Boston after the bombings, which the people almost welcomed after the mainstream media pumped enough fear into them. The whole city was locked down because of one man who killed literally a couple of people, yet because the whole thing was drummed up so utterly dramatically by the media people bought into it. It was bonkers.

    Ebola is not a threat but the people saying it is are.

View thread