Science
Science
Out of context: Reply #334
- Started
- Last post
- 1,014 Responses
- scarabin0
from what you've been saying though yuri, (namely, that old anthropomorphic archetypes and spiritual models are better than research and observation when it comes to understanding the universe) i think you should join the OTO or golden dawn. a couple years of that and you might be better informed about these "consciousness techniques" you're constantly talking about.
you make fun of magick but it's precisely what you've been campaigning here for years.
- I think those systems are valid. Pyramids in egypt were built in conjunction with ancient math and use of those systems,yurimon
- Its out of arogance of Europeans in how they portray what is primitive without complete understanding.yurimon
- thanks for the offer im workin on somethin already.yurimon
- did you know the human brain was 10% larger pre industrial farming revolution.?yurimon
- we also had tails at one point. so what?scarabin
- where are you even getting that information?scarabin
- this was based off of research study done. so if you find the study https://constantincr…yurimon
- http://io9.com/57531…yurimon
- articles premise is stupid but you get the idea. read the actual study. I think its food related more so then what it suggests.yurimon
- this says our brains have shrunk but become smarter. and says nothing about the industrial revolution.scarabin
- Article uses the study of the 10%. you need find the original. article of smarter is bullshit.yurimon
- they using the brain shrinkage. its not like fiber optics vs copper wire geniousyurimon
- why not link me to the study instead of something that says the opposite of what you're claiming?scarabin
- and why are you supposedly looking at scientific studies, anyway? science is just a belief system, remember?scarabin