Science
Science
Out of context: Reply #332
- Started
- Last post
- 1,014 Responses
- Morning_star0
@monospaced re:no evidence
You keep saying there is no evidence for 'anything' beyond matter when there is clearly mountains of evidence across thousands of years.
I expect the problem you may have with that claim is the evidence I'm talking about doesn't fit into the narrow, materialist, lab-based tests that you think are the only way of measuring anything.I have a couple of questions:
I wonder if you can provide the outline of a quantitative experiment that could test for Creativity in humans?
Also, could you give a materialist explanation for what started the Big Bang.- ummm, claims of miracle births and talking burning bushes aren't evidence, bromonospaced
- are you implying creativity isn't a natural ability in higher mammals? because that would be retardedmonospaced
- additionally, there are several strong theories that are purely materialistic explanations for the big bangmonospaced
- in fact, you wouldn't even use the term big bang if there weren't scientific explanations for itmonospaced
- What a surprise, it's the same old argument. Sweeping generalisations, an obsession with religion and baseless claims with no evidence. Blind faith in action.Morning_star
- Blind faith in action.
Morning_star - "Creativity" is just an abstraction isn't it? It's something people came up with, not something that can be directly measured.ukit2
- Kind of like trying to measure intelligence...you can try to do it, but will always be subjectiveukit2