Apple
Out of context: Reply #343
- Started
- Last post
- 3,882 Responses
- formed0
They'll make something. No reason to hire that Burberry chick and the TAG exec if they aren't going after "fashion". I'd put money on an iwatch after the TAG hire (why would you hire a watch guru if you aren't going to make a watch? And who better to help with the efforts than a "reasonably" high end watch guy). Personally, I think those hires are pretty exciting and I am curious to see what they make. It'll have to be superb, though, or it'll just be another 'thing' (so far, the wearables are all useless "things", nothing most would buy).
Give me a super indestructible health band-like thing that is also very stylish and I'd buy. But I'll never replace a real watch with a disposable piece of technology.More curious to see how the stock behaves...so much perfection priced in right now
- < yeahmonospaced
- and stock is a huge BUY right now, it's got nowhere to go but upmonospaced
- I'm just so disappointed in the stupid ass fan ideas of what they think it will be. They're so depressingly badmonospaced
- Yup, but Apple is wise to site back, keep expectations close to the Samsung thingformed
- I have a hard time believing they can't blow that out of the waterformed
- wordmonospaced