45th Anniversary of Moon Landing

Out of context: Reply #26

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 69 Responses
  • detritus0

    Here, set - knock yourself out, the Indian satellite that orbited the moon a couple of years back did actually take high-enough resolution images to make out details of the landing sites (I must admit, I thought they didn't - I thought it was just NASA's LRO that had).

    http://phys.org/news171102159.ht…

    of course, you could then argue:

    "Yeah, but the Indians are American shills!"
    or
    "Yeah, but those could've been robotic tracks!"
    or
    *squints*
    "They're CLEARLY reptile egg trails!"

    • IS THERE ANY WAY TO HAVE THIS PHOTO IN HI-RES, PLEEEZGeorgesIV
    • Oh...are you going to run some tests in the lab? What a clown.marychain
    • Hey I never said I thought the US didn't go to the moon... Just wondered if there were pictures to shut people up.set
    • Thanks for the linkset
    • I know I come across as a bit of a fringe nut sometimes but I believe they went to the moon.set
    • Though that low res photo of standard moon terrain hardly does much to cement my beliefset
    • It's the best of the world's been bothered to try and do... as I implied, the Yanks are WAY ahead in this game.detritus
    • 'the best the rest of the world's been able to do.. ' evendetritus

View thread