Science

Out of context: Reply #195

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 1,010 Responses
  • utopian0

    utopian 0Permalink
    UpvoteDownvote
    Flag
    • Really. We can't see it....We don't know what it is...It's invisible... It's wishy washy speculation dressed up as science fact. There's more evidence for bigfoot FFSMorning_star
    • evidence for Bigfoot FFSMorning_star
    • But it's there, regardless of if we can define it completely.monospaced
    • There is no 'IT'. 'IT' isn't there, its gravitational effect can be measured but there is no 'IT'. Whatever DM is, it doesn't fall in to the Standard Model and is arguably non-material.Morning_star
    • to the Standard Model and is arguably non-material. At that point your materialist scientists invent extra dimensions.Morning_star
    • Can't see it, or prove it but believe it. Where have I heard that before? :)ETM
    • ha, you guisemonospaced
    • Morningstar, how would you like it if people dismissed design or whatever you do for a living without understanding a thing about it?ukit2
    • about it? I think a little humility is called for when you're talking about things so far outside of your understanding.ukit2
    • I do get dismissed on a daily basis : ). What I do is essentially subjective and so opinion counts, the same with speculation about the nature of dark matter. It can't be measured by any of sciences universal laws and is therefore beyond conventional understanding. New thinking and consideration of the nature of the universe has to be explored and if the current model doesn't fit then my opinion is no more or less valid than anyone else's. That video claims to explain dark matter and does nothing of the sort. If you're content to believe what you're...Morning_star
    • the nature of dark matter. It can't be measured by any of sciences universal laws and is therefore beyond conventional understanding. New thinking and consideration of the nature of the universe has to be explored and if the current model doesn't fit then my opinion is no more or less valid than anyone else's. That video claims to explain dark matter and does nothing of the sort. If you're content to believe what you're peddled without questioning it then that's cool but I'm not. Science is evidence based and with no evidence then all you have is opinion, speculation...Morning_star
    • understanding. New thinking and consideration of the nature of the universe has to be explored and if the current model doesn't fit then my opinion is no more or less valid than anyone else's. That video claims to explain dark matter and does nothing of the sort. If you're content to believe what you're peddled without questioning it then that's cool but I'm not. Science is evidence based and with no evidence then all you have is opinion, speculation and debate until hypotheses are formed and experiments can be performed.Morning_star
    • then my opinion is no more or less valid than anyone else's. That video claims to explain dark matter and does nothing of the sort. If you're content to believe what you're peddled without questioning it then that's cool but I'm not. Science is evidence based and with no evidence then all you have is opinion, speculation and debate until hypotheses are formed and experiments can be performed.Morning_star
    • of the sort. If you're content to believe what you're peddled without questioning it then that's cool but I'm not. Science is evidence based and with no evidence then all you have is opinion, speculation and debate until hypotheses are formed and experiments can be performed.Morning_star
    • evidence based and with no evidence then all you have is opinion, speculation and debate until hypotheses are formed and experiments can be performed.Morning_star
    • experiments can be performed. .Morning_star
    • "my opinion is no more or less valid than anyone else's"
      You know some people actually study this stuff their entire lives :)      ukit2
    • entire lives :) And here you are jumping in and saying it's nonsense, and oh by the way this paranormal research stuff, that's totally believable.ukit2
    • that's totally believable.ukit2
    • Look at that video and tell me what DM facts you can take from it?Morning_star
    • You were critiquing the entire idea not just the videoukit2
    • As I say in my post (down there v), I claim nothing more than Lawrence Kruass in the you tube video I've linked.Morning_star
    • The fact that you are acknowledging it exists is hypocritical. Yes, it exists, it's matter, and science figured that out.monospaced
    • You know it's matter do you? Any proof? Anything testable? a repeatable experiment perhaps?Morning_star
    • How is acknowledging IT hypocritical. I've never question the existence of DM.Morning_star
    • you can't say it's matter... hahahaset
    Show [[ numHiddenNotes ]] more notesAdd Note
    SaveCancel

View thread