OSX 10.10

Out of context: Reply #29

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 42 Responses
  • hans_glib0

    ugh more bloatware, poor graphics and fluff no-one needs. why can't they strip it back to a bare bones OS and let us benefit from the speed of the new processors?

    oh yeah i forgot... features, man, it's all about the noo feechurs

    • Bloatware?monospaced
    • all those unnecessary "features" that make my new macbook pro run Mavericks as slowly as my old macbook ran SLhans_glib
    • that's not the definition of bloatware, btwmonospaced
    • yes it is - unnecessary features that slows down the computer is exactly what bloatware is.hans_glib
    • I believe bloatware is actually pre-installed applications and trials, not features.monospaced
    • like office, or mcafee, or the OEM interfaces, etcmonospaced
    • well my definition is better ;) it suggests an unnecessarily overweight object that needs slimming downhans_glib
    • which all modern OSs are these dayshans_glib
    • initial installation now means spending time putting the system through a detox/slimming programme to make it run quickerhans_glib
    • make it run quicker.hans_glib
    • You're destined to live a very unhappy life Hans.Ianbolton
    • what exactly do you have to fix after an OS X install for it to run faster?monospaced
    • switch of all automatic downloads, updates, notifications etc etc.... anything that seems to slow the processor downhans_glib
    • @ ianbolton - why? because software engineers are going to ruin it for me?hans_glib

View thread