religion
religion
Out of context: Reply #838
- Started
- Last post
- 3,481 Responses
- Morning_star0
^^
The Enemies of Reason programme whilst interesting is more contrived than the book of Genesis.Full interviews here:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/…As a scientist Dawkins should be ashamed of manipulating the content of his interviews to serve his own agenda, this is dogmatic science in action. He does this lots.
- Yup, Dawkins is no better than religious nutters. Just the other end of the spectrum.********
- As true as that might be, he's still rightmonospaced
- show me the evidence logical fallacy guy...yurimon
- show me the evidence for ANYTHING ELSE being correct... oh that's rightmonospaced
- fucking ironic how religious nuts can demand evidence, and never have any for their stupid beliefsmonospaced
- I'm not religious you must be talking about your belief in science...yurimon
- oh, I thought you were always defending the bible against the devil's hell-sciencemonospaced
- I thoguht you believed in a creatormonospaced
- you literally questioned the validity of evoltuion the other daymonospaced
- I object to the profane view of the world, it is your interpretation sir.yurimon
- < i thought you were a bible thumper toomoldero
- or were you b4, and now your starting to think for yourself?moldero
- What's so bad about editing interviews? Isn't that just what every filmmaker does?ukit2
- profane view? all that means is anything spoken outside the church... so you are religiousmonospaced
- I watched part of the Deepak Chopra one, and it didn't seem to be very different from the showukit2
- Deepak Chopra is full of shit, it must be said :Pukit2
- deeper understanding and the quest foryurimon
- Yup, Dawkins is no better than religious nutters. Just the other end of the spectrum.