gif vs. mp4

Out of context: Reply #9

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 10 Responses
  • akiersky0

    300K is pretty small for an mp4, a gif is not going to be any smaller at that resolution.

    What's the animation for? I think usually the usage dictates the filetype. A gif might be nice for something very short, or that is part of the interface. But if the animation stands on it's own or has photorealistic elements a video is going to be much better.

    Maybe an html5 video with flash fallback, kinda like this:

    <video autoplay loop width="1280" height="720">
    <source src="video.webm" type="video/webm;">
    <source src="video.mp4" type="video/mp4;">
    <source src="video" type="video/ogg;">
    <object width="940" height="529" id="swfFallback">
    <param name="movie" value="swfVideo.swf">
    .... (other swf fallback stuff)
    </object>
    </video>

    • maybe it can be done with 6 colors and at 2 FPS, we don't knowmonospaced

View thread