religion

Out of context: Reply #686

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 3,481 Responses
  • moldero0

    • so truemonospaced
    • What if science is political but you failed to grasp that...yurimon
    • you're still confusing the corrupt parts of some scientific communities for science itself. they are not the same thing.scarabin
    • yeah there is also those part that science can't comprehend. Science is a method but also is imbalanced.yurimon
    • if we could comprehend everything we wouldn't need science. what are you talking about?scarabin
    • that is true but science in its current form is imbalanced... Just look at the pyramids. science was holistic when they were built.yurimon
    • it's not imbalanced, it is just a method for figuring things outmonospaced
    • it can't explain consciousness or have a means to find out what it is. its limited..yurimon
    • besides all the so called great scientist were mystics or got their ideas from old texts like vedas etc.yurimon
    • science has explained consciousness. you can watch thoughts occur, memories being formed, on the molecular level. there's a ton of research going into this.scarabin
    • what do the pyramids have to do with anything?scarabin
    • scarabins right, science has an explanation for it, and at this point it's the only one with any sort of credibilitymonospaced
    • pyramids are an exceptional accomplishment in math, engineering and science. before science. yet science cant explain everything. and has its limityurimon
    • everything and has its limits...
      yurimon
    • science is only limited by reason. it's not a magic 8-ball. that's what religion is for.scarabin

View thread