Science
Out of context: Reply #49
- Started
- Last post
- 1,010 Responses
- ESKEMA0
There's some kind of misconception going on here, at least for me..
There is a common view that some folks here have (Georges and Morning_star, etc) that if I say I believe in science, then everything else not accepted by the majority of the scientific community is false, incontestable or undebatable. That is not the case, at least for me.
I'm completely open to any theory (that makes any sense) that crushes all the facts and theories of the present (if they are better proved and tested). I'm open to aliens (but won't actually believe until real evidence is shown), I'm open to vortex math (because it just makes a lot of sense, needs to get more development in, and other dudes speaking because Rodin and Powell talk like idiots, and this discovery is well above themselves).
To me, alternative stuff like vortex math IS science. it is the very definition of science.What I think people are condoning is the "Church" of science, the institution, the powers that pseudo "control" it. In the end it's just Humans.
But science is not just that, it's the exploration of the imagination, the search for the undiscovered and the unexplained.
Institutions will always be more conservatives, they have to maintain some kind of balance, but ultimately, they are controlled by humans, who comes in all sorts of stupidity levels.
Science doesn't ban xy project research, humans with power do.- YEah it's really ideology not science that people are criticizing...ukit2
- I'll agree with that. :)Morning_star
- yeah, totally I couldn't care less about religions,GeorgesIV
- btw on rodin and powel, you confirm my point that you will not accept any other pov until some science guy comes and say so, how is that not a belief systemGeorgesIV
- how is that not a belief systemGeorgesIV