religion
religion
Out of context: Reply #478
- Started
- Last post
- 3,479 Responses
- ukit20
Actually if you're going by the evidence, there's plenty of evidence that supports the scientific theories of how life began and almost none that supports the religious view. The age of the Earth, the millions of life forms that existed before humans which we have physical evidence of...all directly contradicts the Biblical story of creation.
So pretty silly to say they are the same thing. Even when you have a speculative theory about how life began, it's based on the latest information about biology, evolution, etc. Religion on the other hand...is how people believed the universe worked thousands of years ago. When we still thought the Earth was flat and you could fall off the edge if you sailed far enough...
- Its still theory mind you. big difference between law and theory in science.yurimon
- that being said the theories only go so far thus it still hasnt proven or disproven the argument if god exists.yurimon
- Also there is a difference between telling the masses a story for the sake of control and keeping truth to yourselfyurimon
- You can't prove a negative, but you can look at the evidence and see that the Bible is wrongukit2
- for the sake of power which is what religion the masses accomplishes.yurimon
- er for the massesyurimon
- I mean claiming the world is a few thousand years old and it turns out to be billions of years old...I'd say that's a pretty big problem wouldn't you? :)ukit2
- problem with your theory wouldn't you? :)ukit2
- did you hear what monospaced said? just because it cant be proven doesnt mean its not true.yurimon
- I'm not arguing the bible. its an allegory.yurimon
- So the Bible is made up but God is real?ukit2