Syria

Out of context: Reply #105

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 253 Responses
  • inv0

    I am not saying that they should go ahead and do the attack, but whats the alternative. Do the people who shout "no war" think that there should be no consequence for using chemical weapons?

    And also, isn't there a difference between going to full war and performing a retaliation for crimes against humanity?

    inv 0Permalink
    UpvoteDownvote
    Flag
    • Why would the USA retaliate FOR al quaida linked rebels? Why would Assad use chemical weapons in a war he was winning?eoin
    • winning, when he knew it would be a line crossed? The US war machine commits crimes against humanity ALL THE FUCKING TIME.eoin
    • TIME.eoin
    • Did you read this: http://www.theguardi…eoin
    • Ok, see your point. Americans are hypocrites and they are protecting their own interest. Yes....inv
    • ..But if proven correct, should the usage of chemical weapons be punished?inv
    • What is the consequence, really? We're randomly dropping a missile somewhere to spank you. How does this help anyone?monkeyshine
    • That would ideal if you know who did the attack. Remember WMD's? they jumped on assumption to wage war.yurimon
    • Also ask why 5% of the world population has 25% of world prison population for victimless crimes?yurimon
    Show [[ numHiddenNotes ]] more notesAdd Note
    SaveCancel

View thread