Client wants artwork :(
Client wants artwork :(
Out of context: Reply #25
- Started
- Last post
- 41 Responses
- monospaced0
@twokids The Wal-Mart case you're talking about was one where the creative agency, who retained ownership of the creative (working files and footage), used them in something else. This is the exact opposite of the client using the files for something else. Regardless, Wal-Mart didn't win because they didn't pay for the working files in the first place.
- Additionally, when Wal-Mart asked for the working files, the video production company quoted them a clean $1Mmonospaced