motherf*cker:::
Out of context: Reply #29
- Started
- Last post
- 30 Responses
- monospaced0
From a Wired article. The "science" of Pinterest image popularity.
No human faces: Images without faces get repinned more often than images with faces. Among images shared by brands — retailers, media, etc. — those without human mugs are repinned 23 percent more often. This surprised even Gupta, a veritable scholar of Pinterest behavior. “I would have thought that faces make an image more relatable — it’s a human seeing a human,” he says. But it turns out Pinterest has its own distinctive character as a social network. “We think of Facebook as a network of people, and Foursquare as a network of places. Pinterest is a network of things ... and it seems like on a network of things, faces are actually a distraction.”
Little background: Pinterest includes loads of photos, particularly product images, shot against a plain white background. When an artificial background rises above 40 percent of the total image area, repins are typically halved or quartered. Gupta encourages clients to use a background that provides a compelling context in minimal space — like Deen’s picnic table above.
Multiple colors: Images with multiple dominant colors garner more than three times the replies as images with just one. Hence the strong pink, light green, dark green, red, and gray patches in Deen’s photo above.
Lots of red: Predominantly red or orange images get twice the repins of predominately blue images. (Dig Deen’s tomatoes and pink bowl.)
Moderate light and color: Performance falls off at the extremes. Images with 50 percent color saturation got repinned four times as often as images with 100 percent saturation, and 10 times as often as totally desaturated (black and white) images. A similar dynamic holds true for brightness; very light and very dark images are, generally speaking, repinned one-twentieth as often as images with medium lightness.
Portrait style: Images did best in a vertical orientation with an aspect ration between 2:3 and 4:5. This is a peculiarity of Pinterest, Gupta says: The service tries to rescale or otherwise adapt images that fall outside of this range, making them look bad.