Gay Marriage
Gay Marriage
Out of context: Reply #4
- Started
- Last post
- 6 Responses
- hans_glib0
the controversy is semantics pure and simple.
gays want to be "married"
the church says that "marriage" is a sanctity between a man and a woman in order to procreate (or summat like that)
therefore gays can't "marry" as they aren't a man and a woman procreating, they're a man and a man (or woman and woman) joining together and they can't procreate.
the church doesn't object to a civil union because it isn't a "marriage", it's a civil union.
but this isn't good enough for (some) gays who want to be "married".
even though "marriage" and civil union is one and the same thing.
so they slap each others face arguing over a word.
- Yeah gays are really annoying about it.numero1
- church should have no fucking say in the fucking matter of what a marriage is or isn't, that's the fucking problem!monospaced
- the church isn't government. symantics are simple enough, but these guys are going where they shouldn'tmonospaced
- for fuck's sake! the church invented marriage! Of course they own it...hans_glib
- what i'm saying it's a big fuss over nothing. the church and gays should just stfu and let each other get on with their liveshans_glib
- lives.
and stop whining.hans_glib - it's the recognition and government benefit.pango
- If you think the church invented marriage, your'e a fucking idiot who probably also thinks the world is 10K years old toomonospaced