Flash is back?

Out of context: Reply #8

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 126 Responses
  • animatedgif0

    First one could have been done in html, it's just a video player with hotspots

    Second one broke after the voice over

    Third isn't any more impressive than this http://demooo.com/IKEA/ikea_6s6s…

    • The first and third require streaming video, which runs better/smaller fail rate in flash.instrmntl
    • First one maybe, third isn't any more impressive than the Ikea pieceanimatedgif
    • and how many more times do we have to say "oh but flash can do minor feature X" to pretend it still mattersanimatedgif
    • HTML is constantly moving, Flash is pretty much stagnant since Stage3D failed.animatedgif
    • Its the basis of the site. I'd say it matters.instrmntl
    • I agree that flash is at a halt, and HTML5/JS/etc is quickly catching up.instrmntl
    • I mean matters in the long term. You're talking as if HTML will never stream video.animatedgif
    • flash was evolving quick, what mofos needed to do was learn how to optimize their damn filesmoldero
    • i used to teach that crap at my last agency, seemed like it was anew concept for these guys, but back when flash started shit wasmoldero
    • as important as knowing flash itselfmoldero
    • not only for loading times, but for smooth running on cheap systemsmoldero
    • maybe thats where adobe should have put their focus on, some kind of automatic optimization for newbzmoldero
    • it's called Musemonospaced
    • +1 on the optimisation comment, what the fuck is wrong with people. Seen so many retarded ways of doing things.animatedgif
    • things that end up killing framerateanimatedgif

View thread