dreamweaver sucks!
dreamweaver sucks!
Out of context: Reply #11
- Started
- Last post
- 17 Responses
- lovaboy0
i agree it makes loads more sense to generate pages dynamically. however, the client wants it all static. for me, the attraction of using dreamweaver's template-based system is that you can make changes at any point in the development process to a large number of pages....something you can't do by merely saving multiple copies of a page. i suppose it's true that most large sites are dynamic, making this kind of a moot point...but I'm still amazed at how buggy the 2004 edition was. i've already gone back to MX and am having better luck.